[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Could you clarify? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = From: jsalgueiro@cantv.net I was in Honduras and conocì to the people who administered hn.With the Co diciones of that pais and the resources of which 4.000 disponìan dominions were a barbarism. Honduras is not comparable in poblaciòn, development nor conditions econòmicas with others paìses of regiòn. JOS Original Message: From: Johnny Laureano johnnylaureano@yahoo.com Date: The Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:59:02 -0700 (PDT) To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org, carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com, lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es][lac-discuss-in ] Could you clarify? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = Dear Carlos, In order to refer with respect to his singular punto to me of Vista, in previous oportunidad usted sumó solidariamente a expresiones of support to a ONG deprived Honduran, managing del ccTLD .ht., same that durante casi 20 years, it administered only 4,000 dominios, I ask that remoterof interests of the users of Internet that this poor man result. I consider that it must be constant preoccupation that the interests of the organizations prevailed, in general, does not collide with the interests of the users of Internet and we not only react by individual situations, for that reason my surprise. Therefore, I showed, that so he is opportune to develop one agenda with the LACTLD to raise alternatives and solutions that allow a greater access to the dominions ccTLD of the region, considering the stops costs and commercial strategies, based on its position of monopolies of facto (in LAC and Peru, for example), considering in addition insignificant contributions that several administrators make of ccTDL to the ICANN, if it is that they make some contribution.I invite to him to lead this initiative, their knowledge on the subject and experiencecould be very useful for this proposal. Â Finally, I consider that always there will be space for the discussion. Cartagena, historical city of our brother country will be propitious place in order to talk on concrete subjects and those that consider pertinent. Â Kindly, Â Johnny L. AUI PERU - ALS --- On the Sat, 4/24/10, Carlos Aguirre <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> wrote: From: Carlos Aguirre <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ lac-discuss-in ] You could you clarify? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Saturday, April 24, 2010, 8:57 A.M. Dear Johny: The question was towards Our common Antonio friendand I really create has sufficient capacity,y asi I recognize it, stops to answer by itself and to give me to the answer to the preoccupation that we felt many by the assumed attitude and defense of the interests corporative of a private company that this very far from the interests of the users, segun my particular point of view. In another orderme gustaria that You participated in the teleconferencings and the development of politicas for the region and in collaboration with ALAC but alla of single to appear to make a defense of which does not need it, confusing concepts and not contributing anything discucion raised. Ojala we pruned to find in December in meeting of Cartagena and power us to talk but on the individual. my greetings Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - * 54-351-424-2123/423-5423 to www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:25:22 +0000 > From: johnnylaureano@yahoo.com > To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-in ] Could you clarify? =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=BFPodr=EDa_usted_clarificar=3F __?= =?iso-8859-1?q?Rendiciones_de_cuenta_porque=3F = > From: johnnylaureano@yahoo.com > > Dear friends, >    > In teleconferencing of day of yesterday, many preoccupationswere pronounced respect to the limited participation of the ALS of theregion, by communication problems I could not show to position on the to matter, but I was listening to until the end the to diver commitments to obtain to greater participation of the leaders of the ALS, good intention that decays greatly with personal the cuestionamiento of Carlos Aguiire to our friend Antonio Medina (Pdte of ACUI), to improper and treacherous cuestionamiento of a representative of to ALS against arepresentative of to anotherALS. >    > Our Antonio friend,  is informed on the position into the ACUI and have referred to diver connections where one dog read all the antecedents that the Colombian State eats executing like part from hisestrategia for dominion ccTLD co.   >    > Some antecedents indicate the following thing: >    > The failure of the Council of State of the 10 of July of 2002 ordered to the National Government - Ministry of Technologies of the Information and the Communications "to assume directly or by means of who it designates, within the pertinent legal frame, the administration and handling of dominio.co... " >    > The Resolution 600 of 2002, by which the administration of dominio.co regulates itself partially established that the name of dominion of Internet, to under the code of country corresponding to Colombia.co, is a resource of the sector of the telecommunications, ofpublic interest, whose administration, maintenance and development will be to under the planning, regulation and control of the State, through the Ministry of Technologies of the Information and the Communications. > à  > à  > It said it and it remembers to U.S., Jose Luis Barzallo, respectto the intervention limits of the ICANN and of the ALS including in our own countries, à result that I a.m. safe they will reflect in thesurvey that Rudi Vansnick eats applying from the relations between theALSand losà ccTLD of the region. > à  > Perhaps there am is opportune, in view of the results of this survey, from the point of view of the Latin American internauts, to develop anagenda with the LACTLD to raise alternatives and solutions that allow to to greater Access to the dominions ccTLD of the region, considering the high costs and commercial strategies, based on to their position de facto ofmonopolies (in Peru, for example). > à  > I a.m. in agreement with most of the initiatives obtaining to greater participation of the spilled ALS the day of yesterday, but I a.m. not in agreement with the irrespetuoso treatment of representativesof to ALS against to worthy one represents of the internauts of our to brother country of Colombia, for that reason I want to express my shared in common endorsement to him. > à  > Kindly, > à  > Johnny Laureano > AUI PERU - ALS > à  > à  > à  > à  > > --- On Fri, 4/23/10, carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > From: carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> > Subject: Could you clarify? > To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Cc: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Friday, April 23, 2010, 8:32 A.M. > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Could you clarify? > Of: carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com > > > > Dear Antonio. After the thought mentioned by Alex. Him desire also asking which is the ACUI position, when the Co now is administered by the company deprived with very to diver interests that users of the end, without the participation of the users of the end ina national Bussiness,and how dog explain the fact that the Co will beuse like to cubical to centimeter (national dominion of the identification), and the commercial identificator? I a.m. really surprised for its words in the teleconferencing yesterday. Could you explain me? The situation is not to clear for and I worry itsrepresentation of the users of the end. You plows participating or some to other delutilizador representative of the end in desitions of ccTLD ofthe Co? Which was the participation of the users of the legal end in definitions ofthe structure of ccTLD (also used like gTLD)? Of what maneraestà n > protected rights of users of the end? You! > à  (same you or its ALS) receives to certain "contribution" of administrator of the Co? Why you made the propaganda of Co infacebook? Plow you interested in a growth of the company? and in this marries porqué? > > Carlos Aguirre > > _________________________________________________________________ > Easy very of there am is of the meetings to organize with of Hotmailand Calendar: invitations and I received confirmations of attendanceof enviÃ. > http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/calendar.aspx > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ç7eb2fa78.html > --]] > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6fab0f979d.html > --]] > > >                     Â
With Windows Live Mail chequeá your Hotmail and other accounts of email without being connected. I discovered more. http://www.microsoft.com/latam/windows/windowslive/products/mail.aspx _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c98159ceb5.html --]]