[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: FW: FW: FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Estmados today or tomorrow send an email to the issuance of a document part of LACRALO. Aquuna reading very interesting comments on the same Thematic. Best regards Alberto Soto From: iana-issues-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: iana-issues-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Sbastien Bachollet Posted on: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 11:11 a.m. To: IANA Issues Subject: [IANA-issues] FW: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act For info. Seems interesting. All the best Sbastien Bachollet +33 6 07 66 89 33 Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/ Mail: Sbastien Bachollet <sebastien@bachollet.com <mailto:sebastien@bachollet.com> > From: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> > Date: mardi 9 juin 2015 15:16 'Accountability Cross Community' <accountability-cross-community@icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org> > Objet: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act Colleagues Below is a brief notice, and attached is a copy of a bill That will be Considered in Congress tomorrow Relating to the IANA transition. UNLIKE other bills floating in Congress, this one has the support of the Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. In other words, it has support of Both Democrats and Republicans and, implicitly, is something the Administration would likely accept.THUS, though one can never be sure In These matters, I assess it as it reasonably likely That esta Will Become bill law. On the Merits, my own sense is That many in the community will welcome the Provisions of esta bill. First, and foremost, it puts Congress on record in behalf of the overall goal of having the transition happen, just thus laying to Concerns rest That Might some in Congress seek to short-circuit the process. In more detail (and you can read the short text for yourself, in the attached PDF), the bill provides: 1. There will be 30 legislative days (ie working week days) after notification to Congress prior to the transfer going into effect. This will allow Congress to review the terms of the transfer. To stop it, however, would require a separate bill enacted into law. 2. It requires NTIA to certify That the Proposed transition meets the five September criteria by the NTIA at the start of the process.This Seems to very modest requirement, since if our proposal did not meet That set of requirements, NTIA would not approve it in the first instance. 3. It requires Also NTIA to certify That ICANN has approved and Implemented all required bylaw end Changes contained in the report of the CCWG and the CWG before the transition OCCURS, ie ICANN has to follow through and the bylaw review process complete before the Formal termination of the contract. Regards Paul Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq@redbranchconsulting.com> O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066 Link to my PGP Key <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl e & id = 19 & Itemid = 9> Subject: Bipartisan Amendment to DOTCOM Act Friends: Please find attached a copy of the Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute That Walden Chairman, Ranking Member Pallone, and Mr. Shimkus Have Agreed to. As we Mentioned on calls to many of you, we think esta amendment Represents to the responsible path forward respects the multistakeholder process without abrogating our Committee's oversight of NTIA. Very shortly, we will be noticing a subcommittee markup For This Wednesday, Where we expect the subcommittee will report favorably to the HR 805 With bipartisan support committee. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d85af27bd2.html --]]