[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Subject: Re: ICANN's risk management From: hcarrascob@gmail.com Thanks Fatima, Procredera make the survey. Regards Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> i wrote:
Thanks Ftima. It is incredible that with a little of each collaboration, Is advancing so quickly. Only to be much better if they were not always the same, our Regin Muchsimo will grow. Best Regards
Alberto Sotol
----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Fatima Cambronero Sent: I saturday, January 24, 2015 9:25 pm To: Alejandro Pisanty CC: LACRALO Espaol Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ICANN's risk management
Humberto, Alejandro,
To contribute to this proposal by Alejandro activity, which seems a Very good initiative, accompanying table risks to ICANN as Company and have been included in the document enviAlejandro with Each tems in two versions: espaol inglsy. As to the list of discussion in English do not get documents Attachments, I copy below the same content as in Table I estincluido Attached. Please check for sb error in translation.
Best regards, Fatima Cambronero
* Enterprise-Wide Risks ICANN list *
1) Failure to Maintain and adhere to it adequately Existing accountability -Mechanisms.
Failure to properly maintain and adhere to the mechanisms of rendicin Existing accounts.
2) Failure to Demonstrate accountability and transparency of Sufficient Organization.
Failure to demonstrate sufficient accountability and transparency Organization.
3) Lower than forecasted revenues.
Lower revenues than expected.
4) Adverse legal or other dispute resolution ruling, treats including possible Related penalties, fees and costs.
Judicial-resolution or other adverse resolution of disputes, including Possible penalties, fees and related costs.
5) Failure to sufficiently It manage and enforce THE HUNDREDS of Contracts With TLD operators.
Failure to manage and enforce sufficiently, hundreds of Contracts with TLD operators.
6) Unsuccessful delivery of a stakeholder Proposal and other Relevant Deliverables for a Successful transition NTIA stewardship of the IANA Functions.
Delivery unsuccessfully a proposal from stakeholders and other Significant deliverables for a successful transition from the NTIA Supervision of the IANA functions.
7) Significant financial loss, other than lower-than-anticipated revenues (Eg, fraud, investment loss, etc.).
Significant financial losses, with exception of low income ms Provided (for example, fraud, loss of investment, etc.).
8) Potential for New gTLD Program issues related to accountability -Mechanisms due to possible adverse decision or failure of mechanism / process.
Possible problems for the New gTLD Program related Accountability mechanisms due to possible adverse decision or failure Mechanism / process.
9) Unfunded operational costs or unplanned expenses.
Operational costs without financiacino unplanned expenses.
10) That perception Potential Conflicts of Interests not all are Identified During decision-making process.
Perception that not all potential conflicts of interest are Identified during the process of decision making.
11) Possible That perception ICANN has poor overall engagement, transparency, Policy, coordination and communication.
Possible perception that ICANN has global commitment, transparency, Policy, coordinaciny poor communication.
12) Significant Increase in legal filings or other dispute resolution That Could staff capacity challenge, distract and disrupt operations leadership.
Significant increase in the records of judgments or other Kind of resolution of disputes will be able to be a challenge for the capacity Staff, distract leaders and disrupt operations.
13) Policy development process is too slow or ineffective, participants Decrease or stagnate, or failure to bring new stakeholders into the model.
The process of developing policies is too slow, participants Diminish or stagnate, or inability to attract new players Interested in the model.
14) Potential legal actions from parties believe That That They Have Been RESULTING injured from New gTLD Program.
Potential legal action from parties who believe they have been daadas As a result of the New gTLD Program.
15) Significant revenue reduction (eg, domain name reduced volume, reduced CcTLD contributions Issue, reduced registration fees, etc.).
Significant reduction of income (eg volume reduced Domain name ccTLD contributions reduced, reduced fees Recorders, etc.).
16) Perception of failure and help in Place to Achieve a globa
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7e6f550d81.html --]]