[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:????? Q = utf-8 B3n_IA Importante_sobre_la_transici = C3 = = = utf-8 q NA =? From: fatimacambronero@gmail.com Alberto, Several points for comments and / or reflection: 1. A lounge is a place to discuss policies. Fellow who has been and has worked with Janice in the lounge of the newcomers know that Space is the place to "sell" what you are representing, say what that is being done, and share their appeal for more people to join and participate. In the case of Fellows that was easy to do, I'm not so Secure it with the LACRALO. 2. The policies are discussed in work lists in groups work and / or monthly calls. Having mentioned that report Alexander, would have served not only to show the community what we have been doing in terms of policies, but also as a kind of metrics of our ALS. According to my understanding, in the meetings of the Chairs and Secretaries THIN, everyone was going to take a report on these issues. Is not it? Of what Reports are made at these meetings / calls? He understood that now should have been just a "copy and paste" to have ready that report and share with all our RALO. Moreover, in my case I have asked many times you add in the agenda calls LACRALO monthly dedicated to a point policies -in what was working, what comments were made, what comentartios were open, etc., not only but also ALAC LACRALO. As time has gone past the point of policies at the end of the agenda if not it was time to review the point-to eliminárselo definitely on the agenda of our monthly calls. In my opinion, that directly undermines the ability we have or We had to produce comments and participate in the discussion of policies. Adding that when comments are requested-I've done infinities times-no answer. Or no one.And it is not possible that the agenda RALO a whole is marked by the opinion of a single ALS. Among the LACRALO operating principles it states that "operate by consensus. "And that consensus involves more than one ALS reviewing and obviously discussing. Unfortunately that is not happening in LACRALO. 3. I understand that as you say it has been hard work and that is You can notice. However in recent times the job has not been on substantive issues. I also understand that not everyone can be in possibilities to contribute to substantive issues or policies. But, 2, 3, or 4 ALS-being generously participating in 44, 45 ALS in our RALO, right It implies that something we are failing? It is clear that we all do volunteer work in LACRALO and At-Large and we have other major works. However, when we we certify as ALS assume a commitment, get involved, of participate, to "represent". Perhaps in this ICANN meeting in our region is an opportune time to review that commitment. 4.One of the reasons many times and many people were held to express their lack of participation was the lack of training. Not I think there have been earlier in the history of many ICANN Webinars as in recent times. Just check the list of those attending Webinars to support argument goes, with that lack of training is excuse. There overabundance of training and yet not advantage. 5. LACRALO has pioneered many issues and activities that have then been followed by other RALO. Perhaps we now serve us, identify thinning that is more involved and more involved in substantive matters, and see if we can copy them we who helped them to them. There are many ways for us to review, analyze, and discuss, through the list in the next monthly call or those present at the meeting Buenos Aires. In my opinion, it would be very healthy for our THIN get out of this well sort of stagnation in which we are left, for the policies. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero The June 16, 2015, 20:12, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> He wrote:
Alejandro y todos, estoy tomando todas las sugerencias recibidas, pero si observas un poco, verás que tampoco he tenido tiempo. Estoy también colaborando en otras cosas para ICANN 53. Intentaré concretar lo que pides. Quizás con ese informe que sugeriste se pueda notar la cantidad de trabajo y participación que estamos realizando.
El LAC Space puede contener discusiones, asà que tomaremos ese tema.
También me gustarÃa que cuando pido opinión, recibir algo más que una, porque debo tomarla y tratar de ejecutarla.
Respecto del MOU, como lamentablemente ya no podremos firmarlo en Buenos Aires, podemos esperar hasta después de ICANN 53, con un informe sobre el mismo en nuestra próxima reunión mensual.
Saludos cordiales
Alberto Soto
*De:* Alejandro Pisanty [mailto:apisanty@gmail.com] *Enviado el:* martes, 16 de junio de 2015 09:47 p.m. *Para:* Alberto Soto *CC:* LACRALO Español *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-es] Importante sobre la transición IANA
Alberto,
si el LAC Space es nuestra sala de visitas sugiero que no. Si es el espacio de discusión absolutamente sÃ.
Por cierto no has procesado mi moción de consultar las precauciones acerca de un modelo de membresÃa, para el cual ya cuentas con un borrador, ya cuentas con varias opiniones afines, y ésta es la tercera vez que te lo solicito formalmente.
Por mi parte me señalo por retraso en el armado en un solo documento de un borrador del convenio con LACNIC que ya está en un estado avanzado de negociación. Retraso que atribuyo a cargas innesperadas de trabajo y a ineficiencias del sistema a mi alrededor pero no me eximen. ¿Quieren tú o Antonio Medina tomar esta tarea con todos los elementos que el Grupo de Trabajo ya conoce, o me esperas al fin de semana?
Slaudo a todos.
Alejandro Pisanty
2015-06-16 19:33 GMT-05:00 Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org>:
El tema que abordamos hace pocos dÃas y en el que tenemos que seguir avanzando. Quizás debe ser el segundo tema en las dos horas del lunes 22 en LAC Space.
Por cortesÃa de Rinalia:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2015/stakeholder-proposals-come-together-icann-...
Saludos cordiales
Alberto Soto
------------------------------
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. *www.avast.com* <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list *lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org* *https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es*
*http://www.lacralo.org* <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
-- <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de QuÃmica UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÃXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: *http://pisanty.blogspot.com* LinkedIn: *http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty* Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, *http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614* Twitter: *http://twitter.com/apisanty* ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, *http://www.isoc.org* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
------------------------------ [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
* Fatima Cambronero * Attorney-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter:facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/fa782ae8f2.html --]]