March 4, 2009
9:47 p.m.
This is the Draft statement on the operational plan and budget on the EURO-Discuss list : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org/2009-March/001365.html - Dev Anand Teelucksingh >------- Original Message ------- >From : Carlton Samuels[mailto:carlton.samuels@uwimona.edu.jm] >Sent : 3/4/2009 4:20:50 PM >To : lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org >Cc : iza@anr.org; izumiaizu@gmail.com >Subject : RE: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [EURO-Discuss] Draft statement on theoperational plan and budget > >Dear Colleagues: See the EURALO response to the Draft Budget and Operational Plans. I have seen the draft shared by CLO but have not gone into the details. However, I can confirm the basic information referenced by Vittorio. I suggest that LACRALO develop its own response and reference the EURALO Statement with full support. I would further suggest that we specifically reference the statement by Izumi Aizu this morning in the ALAC Review Workshop. I have copied Izumi to this note so he can send me the exact wording. Best, Carlton ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net> Date: Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Draft statement on the operational plan and budget To: Discussion for At-Large Europe <euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Discussion for At-Large Europe <euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org>, Carlton Samuels < carlton.samuels@gmail.com> Hi, the statement was forwarded to Evan/NARALO and Carlton/LACRALO for verification and potential support (more doesn't seem to be realistic on short notice). Several of us agree that it cannot be included in the Summit Declaration without prior approval of all - besides some other formal considerations. But I agree that it should be presented at tomorrow's Open Forum. Best, Wolf Max Senges wrote Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:19: >I am also in favor - and if we manage to get other RALO support that would >be good - can someone circulate it to them? > >however i not sure it should go into the final declaration > >max > >On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Annette Muehlberg ><Annette.Muehlberg@web.de>wrote: > >> i think it should be read on behalf of euralo first and we should get the >> other ralos and alac supportit and of course it should go in the final >> summit documents. >> >> best greetings >> annette >> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > Von: "Adam Peake" <ajp@glocom.ac.jp> >> > Gesendet: 04.03.09 18:35:34 >> > An: Discussion for At-Large Europe < euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Draft statement on the operational plan and >> budget >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >> > I support the statement and would be happy if it were read on behalf >> > of EU RALO, or in my name if it would be appropriate for some form of >> > individual sign-up. >> > >> > Adam >> > >> > >> > >> > >Wolf Ludwig ha scritto: >> > >> Thank you very much, Vittorio, for this excellent draft statement >> what I >> > >> fully support in its "hard on ICANN" manner. The text is well >> substantiated >> > >> and the operational plan and budget document is contradicting all the >> > >> official talk about "multistakeholder involvement" and "Bottom-up >> policy >> > >> development". >> > > >> > >What do we do next? I understood that we need to release this urgently, >> > >before the end of the ICANN meeting. >> > >As it seems that we all agree on it, could we suggest the other RALOs >> > >and the ALAC to support it? Or could it go in the final Summit >> documents? >> > >Also, another opportunity would be for you (as Chair) to read it during >> > >the public forum tomorrow. >> > >Ciao, >> > >-- >> > >vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- >> > >--------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <-------- >> > > > _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists.icann.org