[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: IT WILL SHORTLY BE CORRECTED VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: silvia.vivanco@icann.org Hello Alexander, The heading of esta email is wrong. Apologies for esta mistake, staff will send the email With the correct heading. Kind regards, Silvia Silvia Vivanco Manager, At-Large Regional Affairs ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> From: Alejandro Pisanty [mailto: apisanty@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 4:14 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Cc: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty Hi, Does not Reflect the subject motion. This is not a vote on a motion I Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote Against It. It is remarkable Also That the person (s) Who Moved for no confidence did not vote. The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion that I've driven. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as evidenced by my vote. It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the censure motion did not vote. Alejandro Pisanty Alejandro Pisanty 18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >: Dear All, Please be so kind to note That the First Vote With regard to the Proposed Motion of No Confidence by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was Governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the Proposed resolution, the following question was Asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe LACRALO That is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALS In This voting process, ALS Voted 28 (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALS. Option YES = 7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of the total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. ACCORDING TO RULE 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting Shall Be Regarded as Having Voted not. Poll As at close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28 · Group size: 47 · Percentage Voted: 58.89 of the total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % You votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** As per instruction published on the Next Steps Regarding the Motion of No Confidence < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, You May Independently check the vote result under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q ES == == Hello everyone, Please note that the first vote on the censure motion proposed by Mr. Carlton Samuels has been completed. The voting process will be governed by rules 12, 19, and 20 of the Rules of Procedure of LACRALO. With regard to the proposed resolution, the following is the question First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you think that LACRALO is competent to vote on the motion of censure? 1. If the censure motion should proceed. 2. No, the motion of censure should be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSes in the process of voting, 28 voted ALSes (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum required quorum is 24 ALSes. Option SI - 7 equivalents to 13.61% of the total weight Votes. Option NO - 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions by voting = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. According to Rule 12.2, the structures that abstain from voting are considered as not having voted. When closing the vote: Friday October 16 2015, 23 UTC. Total Votes: 28. Group size: 47. Percentage voted: 58.89 total weight Votes position Options Position Options Weighted votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** According to the instructions issued in the following steps on the motion of censure < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, You can review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <http://www.facebook.com/icann> AtLarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3358ac8d41.html --]]