Evidentemente es un problema de procedimiento, inverso a todo lo que es natural, que lleva a errores graves de interpretación. Sería posible modificar el procedimiento para hacerlo igual que todos los otros? O enviar un mail diciendo quien resultó seleccionado? Tienen ustedes idea de las consecuencia de las malas interpretaciones? Creo que no. Ahora podrían explicar el porqué la falta de los otros postulantes? Este procedimiento no parece ser claro. Y más aún cuando la actual seleccionada en su anterior selección, nos enteró a toda la lista de su designación, unas cuantas horas antes de la comunicación oficial. Tenía privilegios? Esta fue una pregunta que se hizo y nunca fue contestada. Creo que en todos lo niveles debemos ser transparentes, y además exigirlo en procedimientos como los que involucran a este cargo tan importante, al menos para nosotros. Saludos Alberto Soto -----Mensaje original----- De: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de staff@atlarge.icann.org Enviado el: martes, 09 de julio de 2013 11:23 p.m. Para: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: ICANN At-Large Staff Asunto: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from LACRALO [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: FW: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from LACRALO From: staff@atlarge.icann.org Dear All, PLEASE NOTE THAT this poll was a poll preferential With The voters being Asked to place candidates in Their order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 being The most preferred and 3 being the Least preferred. As such, the preferred candidate With The highest votes will Have the deals, most hotels raw score. In this instance, the winner of the poll is Vanda Scartezini. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:45 PM To: "Alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:alac-announce@atlarge-lists.ic ann.org> " <alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac-announce@atlarge-lists.ic ann.org >> Subject: VOTE RESULTS: ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from LACRALO Dear All, With 14 out of 15 ALAC Members having voted in the ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from LACRALO poll, we can confirm That the result is quorate. ***** QUESTION Please place the candidates below (listed in alphabetical order by surname) in your order of preference from 1 to 3, with 1 being the Most Preferred and 3 being the Least preferred, for the position of ALAC Voting Delegate to the NomCom for 2014 from LACRALO. * Carlos Aguirre * Humberto Carrasco * Vanda Scartezini RESULTS As at Poll close: Tuesday 09 July 2013 23:59 UTC Number of voters: 14 Group size: 15 Percentage voted: 93.33 Ranked by largest sum of preference votes Rank Candidate Votes% 1 Carlos Aguirre 31 36.90 Humberto Carrasco 2 27 32.14 Vanda Scartezini 3 26 30.95 ***** We can confirm That the Following members did not Participate In this vote: Jean-Jacques Subrenat We can confirm That the Following members abstained In this vote. For Those That have abstained, would you like to Provide an explanation of why you abstained? n / a You May Independently review the results under: http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=3239kXjftxZk4G5KMj74YVKT Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> to _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7b56cfed18.html --]] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en