[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:????? = Iso-8859-1 La_Junta_de_ICANN_se_aparta_de_un q = q = iso-8859-1 F3n_del_GAC a_recomendaci = =? From: fatimacambronero@gmail.com Dear / os, As recordarn recently debated this issue in LACRALO ALAC and we made one declaration Len on modification of ICANN's Bylaws as the Board departs from a recommendation of GAC, especially with regard to the necessary mayoras members of the Board to do so. At that time we had comments indicating that this is not true frequency. Now a case of withdrawal of the recommendation of the GAC is presented. The GAC in its Communiqude London ( https://gacweb.icann.org/display/GACADV/2014-06-25+RCRC), protection of names as Red Cross and Red Crescent, it's recommen ICANN Board names Red Cross and Red Crescent (new gTLDs) not should be equated with trademarks or trade names and therefore its protection is not performing a travs pruning mechanisms Brands of protection provided by ICANN; the protections due to Names Red Cross and Red Crescent should not be subjected or conditioned to a process of development policies (PDP); and that protection of these names should be made a priority, including in particular the names of international organizations and National Red Cross and Red Crescent. Now the Chair of the Board, Steve Crocker responds to the new Chair of GAC, Thomas Schneider ( https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/crocker-to-schneider-03...) ybsicamente says that under the ICANN Bylaws, the responsible within its structure to develop and make recommendations to Board on substantive policies regarding domain names Generic is the GNSO.Therefore, the Board preocupacin about Communiqu London ARE inconsistency with the framework established in the ICANN Bylaws regarding the authority of the GNSO. There is a working group within the Board has developed a Consultation procedure for these situations, activated from This written response from Chair of the Board, explaining the reasons of the apartment. This procedure includes communications between the Board and the GAC try to find acceptable solutions. You can find this Consultation Procedure as an adjunct in the above link that contains the Charter Schneider Crocker. This procedure has a duration of 6 months which may be extended if necessary. Serinteresante see how it evolves over the next matter months. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero - * Fatima * Cambronero Attorney-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter:facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/47fd82d647.html --]]