[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Vote LACRALO on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: fatimacambronero@gmail.com Humberto, I'm wanting to enter comments in the Wiki you share us, and apparently it is not enabled. I do not know if my problem or something general part of this Wiki. I am sharing my comments below, while this is solved. I appreciate the help to enter comments in the Wiki as we're requesting. (Spanish below) Dear Alan and Albert, I would like to add my comments on this issue. Some time ago, When Dev was member by LACRALO and ALAC With the previous Chair and Secretariat of LACRALO (Jose and Sylvia), Dev and I used to divides the policy issues and we used to present to the RALO the topics and open discussions at the policy level ALAC.After That, the RALO used to Which decides on policy wants to make statements. It's worked for a while When we had a lot of statements from LACRALO. Progressively eliminated Were the policy issues on the agenda of the monthly calls of LACRALO. I They Were Asked again to the schedule included several times (you can checked the records). In My Opinion, the Most Important objective to include the policy issues on the schedule of teleconferences is to make our statements of LACRALO Informed or to make Contributions from the RALO to the statements of the ALAC. In short, make the voices of the Internet Representatives from our end users Heard region are. It has not Been happening at RALO level During the last time. I strongly support the substance of esta motion. Then, we can discuss the details. My two cents. Fatima Dear Alan and Albert, I would like to add my comments on this subject. Some time ago, when Dev was a member of LACRALO ALAC, and the Previous President and Secretary of LACRALO (Joseph and Sylvia), Dev and I We used to divide the policy issues and used to present to the RALO open issues and policy debates in ALAC. After that, the RALO decided on what policies comment. This worked for time when we had several statements of LACRALO. Increasingly, policy issues have been phased out of the agenda calls monthly LACRALO. I asked her to the back including many times (you can check the logs). In my opinion, the most important goal of including issues policies on the agenda of our teleconferencing is make statements LACRALO or make informed from contributions from the RALO ALAC statements. In short, make the voices of representatives of end users in our region are heard. This is not happening to RALO level in recent times. I strongly support the substance of this motion. Then we can discuss the details. My two cents. Fatima The August 17, 2015, 19:45, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote:
Estimados,
Aquí tienen el enlace de la propuesta:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54692654
Decidimos agregar dos días más para comentarios antes de iniciar el proceso de votación.
Saludos _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
* Fatima Cambronero * Lawyer Argentina / Mexico Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - Mexico: +52 (55) 3018 2066 Twitter:facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/aa3775d548.html --]]