[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: We agree with Sergio Salinas From: apisan@unam.mx Sergio, everything that you say, it seems that this position confirms Vanda reading (which I share): What you say Christian Homes and supports the FIRST LEVEL appears to refer to the gTLD. The ongoing discussion concerns the second level ** ** something aa.tld type, where a is any combination of two letters. You can explicitly confirm or deny? Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty School of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Sergio Salinas Porto [presidencia@internauta.org.ar] Posted on: Thursday, August 14, 2014 17:03 To: Vanda Scartezini CC: Cristian Hernan Casas; LACRALO Espaol Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] We agree with Sergio Salinas Dear Vanda: I'll try to be clear, anyone know (by knowledge or usual) that two characters are used to demarcate the ccTLD. Many times in ICANN (not always tell), are discussing what want to do business, maybe it's time to start thinking about how these changes will impact on end users. We, the end users, who usually know (except for rare exceptions, such as you name in your example) gTLDs are three oms ccTLD characters and two-character A ccTLD default allows us users know what law governs these domains, in terms of rights and obligations and gives us some kind of quiet as to how to manage with regard to this as recognize to be clear rules. The utilization of two characters in a NgTLD may cause some kind of confusion about this and will put an "uncomfortable" place (to call somehow) to Internet users. The table on the ISO 3166 Alpha-2 -1 indicates that there are certain characters they still were not used, but I believe these can be used by passes or new territories at some point and MUST NOT be given to anyone. I always remember how the world has changed after the fall of the wall and tambiny before and have changed the map of the world, what I consider little of my child is no longer seen as I asy passes that were called for now call a form from another or passes that made others today ESTN separate and distinct called, which follow two table asesa characters must be preserved for what it was created: one standard providing international codes for the names of countries and other administrative units to define level domain names geogrfico superior and not to do business with some enterprising a little money in their pockets. I hope to be clear ... although this is quite complex. A dear friend hug * Sergio Salinas Porto Argentina President Internauta Argentina Association of Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar> FLUI American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilatin.org> facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> & sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII> twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas> Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto < https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts> Hangout: presidencia@internauta.org.ar <Hangout%3Apresidencia@internauta.org.ar> / Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto> Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto> Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, whenever we received orders to humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo Galeano * The August 14, 2014, 18:26, Vanda Scartezini <vanda@uol.com.br> I wrote:
Déjame entender. Estamos hablando de según nivel de nombres de dominio. Los ccTLD y otros gTLDs ya los están utilizando. Como aqui en Brasil hay, por ejemplo: @ ....bb.br para los bancos en Brasil. No creo que permitir a los demás con respectiva negociación con el dueno de los dos caracteres, sea diverso do que ya ocurre. Negar es tener un tratamiento diverso en el mercadeara grupos que disputan el mismo mercado, lo que no me parece justo. Para mi esto no es lo mismo que tener .amazon o .patagonia y si es lo mismo que tener - y nosotros o siquiera nuestros países contestaron - amazon.com o patagonia.com Es una cuestión de ser justo y tener la misma regla a todos. O a mi ver obrigamos a todos los que ya utilizan 2 caracteres ascii a cancelar estos nombres de según nivel. Agradezco si me convencen del contrario Abrazos
Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
On 8/12/14, 13:23, "Cristian Casas" <cristiancasas@hotmail.com> wrote:
Coincidimos con Sergio Salinas Porto en especial a la sugerencia de que el voto sea negativo, ya que sobre esto y en otros temas similares nos hemos manifestado varias organizaciones en LACRALO con respecto a los ngtld y su relación con códigos de país o regiones geográficas (casos: patagonia., .amazonas, .cba.y anexamos la disputa por el mal uso de la lista de ISO 3166-MA en el caso .fk y .gs).
Cristian Casas _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/74b3da8725.html --]]