[[--Translated text (es -> es)--]] Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO and Elections From: cveraq@gmail.com This is what I said and did. Q You vote and I hope we do! The result is already known ... Let the process and now! Carlos VQ Message Sent from my BlackBerry ® Claro terminal ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vanda UOL" <vanda@uol.com.br> Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Thu, July 28, 2011 16:05:29 To: <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO and Elections Friends, we follow the process and stop the time spent with these debates. There process we follow. It was exactly this spending embazó while my proposal not to hold elections now. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 to 1407.8 01418-903 São Paulo, SP, Brazil Tel + 5511 3266.6253 Mob + 55118181.1464 ----- Mensagem original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome jam@jacquelinemorris.com Posted in: fifth-feira, 28 Julho 2011 13:38 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] LACRALO and Elections [[- Translated text (in -> is )--]] Subject: Re: LACRALO and Elections From: jam@jacquelinemorris.com Consensus, without a quorum? That's really uncommon common sense. I I grew up knowing that if there is no quorum, no activity is official quorum is not "meeting". Therefore, how can no consensus unless a quorum at a meeting? A connsensus 4? when a quorum is double? Also, I did not see a vote, I saw a survey to confirm the consensus. (Similar as counting hands in a room, or have F2F members say yes or no. (Which leads to the acclamation) may have a problem with the translation, since the survey and the vote was two very different things in English. Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary, and Invisible Free. (After Chris Lehmann) Thu, July 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Carlos Dionisio Aguirre <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Jacqueline. The consensus was silence. The proposal of any another candidate. The lack of opposition. And, as Joseph is actually a called stupid to vote for a candidate. My two cents. And the sense common please. Sent from my BlackBerry ® wireless device
----- Original Message ----- From: Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 7:35:12 A: <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] LACRALO and Elections
Josà © We have a candidate with the approval of 36 n 4 ALS, I see 1/9th How can consensus. I think if I were the candidate n this position, I'd like all ALS helps me to say, and therefore, I am both officially approved à © matically. 4 out of 36 is kind of a big minorÃa not handle? Sà ³ as my $ 0.03.
Jacqueline A. Morris The technology should be like oxygen: ubiquitous, necessary, Invisible and free. (After © s that Chris Lehmann)
_______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/958523d86e.html --]]