[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_De CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS = iso-8859-1 q = claraci F3n_de_Trusted_ == F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la_Revisi = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_de_la_Comunidad_en_la_Zona_Ra = Representation????? EDz_? == iso-8859-1? q? DNSSEC_clave_de_firma_Ceremonias? = From: aidanoblia@gmail.com Dear Ftima: I agree with the draft Salanieta, with comments Olivier made unless the issue of financiacin, which agree Alexander. The word "sacred" report Salanieta if ESTN may agree be changed to "solemn" because it is a solemnity and compliance is an essential requirement in the process of KSK. Responsibility regarding the control of TCR, which mentions Alejandro on the guarantee of transparency, accountability, and defense of Internet users, and is set as the GenRich Item 9 of the affirmation of commitment between the Department of Commerce U.S. and ICANN, (the first document cited by Salanieta). Also, around the same procedure Ceremony is a guarantee of transparency and protection of users. There is a strict control and detailed in the Declaration of DNSSEC practices of the procedure, accreditation of entry of persons, etc., for the operator of the Area Raz (TCR), your responsibilities are established and each of the steps you must follow what is proper documents governing the security at these levels of reason. There are also prerequisites for the selection and appointment of TCR funciny instructions for cases that can be separated from office for failure.That's part of the process technician, the the company Verisign, a specialist in the field is responsible. As for the number of TCR, understand that it is reasonable as it is postulated for the position, must know and accept their demands were According selected rules and monitored compliance with requirements and estprevisto that of the 21 selected will only designated some for the two ceremonies conducted simultaneously at different places in 4 opportunities each year. The amount will cover ms possible contingencies. In relacina financiacin see important maintain strict independence estcontrolando procedure, among whom are designed to control the process and who are responsible for same, between these last ICANN. This, in addition to exposing and Alejandro there are many whose travel costs that perhaps podray must do without, given the possibility of participacina distance, that is not the case of the TCR, which have to be physically present. By the time I could not climb the commentary wiki Greetings to all Ada On February 2, 2014, 18:10, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:
Fátima,
mil gracias por este mensaje. El proceso descrito - firmado de "llaves" criptográficas que están en la base de la confiabilidad de DNSSEC - es de gran importancia.
En el espacio de ALAC se ha formulado un borrador de texto al que he hecho los siguientes comentarios:
"The statement should be expanded to the recognition of the unique combination the key-signing and TCRs make of broad participation, transparency and accountability in order to serve the central function of preserving and enhancing the stability, security and resilience of the DNS, thus engendering widespread trust.
I do not believe ALAC should propose any increase in processes; streamlining should be the direction.
As for support for TCRs, a statement that acting as a TCR should be cost-neutral for those not supported by firms or other entities should suffice. A statement in very restrained terms would go counter to the possibility that the draft be read as suggesting the poorly warranted creation of yet another source of travel funds."
Me permito presentar una moción a favor de que este texto sea considerado representativo de la opinión de LACRALO.
Alejandro Pisanty
2014-01-31 <fatimacambronero@gmail.com>:
[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]
Asunto: Fwd: CONVOCATORIA DE COMENTARIOS: Declaración de ALAC sobre la Revisión de Trusted Representación de la Comunidad en la Zona Raíz DNSSEC clave de firma Ceremonias De: fatimacambronero@gmail.com
FYI,
---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: ICANN At-Large <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Fecha: 2014-01-31 Asunto: [ALAC-Anuncie] SOLICITUD DE COMENTARIOS: Declaración de ALAC sobre la revisión del Representación de la Comunidad de confianza en la Zona Raíz DNSSEC clave de firma Ceremonias Para: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Queridos todos,
Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Presidente de la ALAC, ha pedido que un llamado
a
la los comentarios se harán en el proyecto de "Declaración de ALAC sobre el examen de confianza Representación de la Comunidad en la Zona Raíz DNSSEC clave de firma Ceremonias < https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag>" Proceso de ratificación de ALAC.
El proyecto actual, así como información adicional sobre el comentario público, se puede encontrar en el At-Large Revisión de Trusted Comunidad Representación en Zona Raíz DNSSEC clave de firma Ceremonias Espacio de trabajo < https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag>.
Por favor, envíe cualquier comentario sobre el área de trabajo utilizando la función de comentarios por 7-Febrero-2014 23:59
Saludos,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine y Julia Charvolen El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f1f744368c.html --]]