[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: monthly LACRALO call. Monday October 17, 2016 - 23:00 UTC Desde: myaguero@msn.com Dear Carlos, Thank you very much for your contributions. In that sense, I think it will be appropriate for the community weigh both positions. Regards, Maritza ________________________________ From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> Posted: Sunday, October 16, 2016 24:24 To: Ral Carlos Gutierrez G. Cc: Alejandro Pisanty; Maritza Aguero Minano Y.; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO monthly call. Monday October 17, 2016 - 23:00 UTC Carlos thank you very much for detail and argumentation of your position. regards Sent from my iPhone The 16/10/2016, at 14:06, Carlos Gutierrez G. Ral<crg@isoc-cr.org<mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org> > Wrote: Humberto Thanks for your explanation and for all those interested in the subject of delegacin of 2-letter codes, I refer to the context of it as I see it from my personal perspective, supported by the case documents: 1. A summary of the theme of the 2-letter codes attached to the second level to below 4 February 2015 attached to this email 2. the position of the GAC on prior to the final decision of the Board Al subject on February 2015 3. The position of the RyG on prior to the final decision of the Board in February 2015 issue about 4. The decision of the Board about the February 12, 2015 about: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-02-12-en#2.a 5. the progress of the revision process to August 2015 https://www.icann.org/news/blog/resolving-the-release-of-two-character-ascii... 6. The current process for delegacin of the 2-letter codes in its current version April 2016 after the adjustments required to the process by the Board: https://www.icann.org/resources/two-character-labels 1.Whereas the recent market survey mentions that the attachment region 6 of the 13 ccTLDs surveyed offer domain names of country code with costs above 100 Euros (page 61 attached below). Despite having requested the President of LACTLD the opportunity to discuss this issue at its morning business workshop, it has not been possible to be realized this behind closed doors 2. Whereas the recent study of the economic impact of the introduction of new gTLDs (attached below) shows in its Table 7, page 40 that the retail prices of the vast majority of new gTLDs estn well below the prices of our ccTLDs in the region. Therefore, it is my position staff to. Be that community in a long process of revision of the delegacin of coitus 2 letter (both non pas codes, such as codes of pas to the second level) with wide participation of GAC and ccNSO. b. the enlargement of the new gTLDs and shows a positive impact on price when compared with the prices of ccTLDs in the region. c.I am willing aor positions contrary to those that I could delineate those documents. But other way for me the situation is clear But meanwhile, I see no direct interest to Internet users the region support the position of LACTLD. Ral Carlos Gutierrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current offset UTC: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On October 16, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Humberto Carrasco wrote: Dear Alexander, First of all, this issue was going to try tomorrow in the monthly meeting. Second, it is wrong to say that t we let die the issue, because there were many opinions on the subject and extended the period for more opinions, which is not ocurri.Estamos preparing a ballot on the issue, but we require staff support for it. What we can do tomorrow is to take a decision by consensus in our monthly call and as approve or reject the declaration of LACTLD domain name d these three characters. Other topics at the meeting of informarn morning. regards Sent from my iPhone The 10/16/2016, at 03:34, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com<mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> > Wrote: Maritza, I ask you please to include an item on the agenda: the resolution on domain names two and three characters, introduced to support the presentation of Andres Piazza by LACTLD. It should be noted that t and Humberto let her die, simply because they failed to call a ballot when they encountered an opposite opinin, by a single participant. A month ago, since this-resolution proposed at the previous monthly teleconference. I ask that you and / or Humberto enven a report before the meeting. It is also appropriate to report on the progress and results of the survey and how they decided to schedule work items.If necessary remove any of the existing points, as the presentation of APC, which has no immediate operational impact, must be done now, as being the last item on the agenda, and being so overloaded sta not be possible to assist you sacrificing postponed decisions. Alejandro Pisanty 10/12/2016 14:39 GMT-05: 00 Maritza Aguero Minano Y. <myaguero@msn.com<mailto:myaguero@msn.com> >: Dear members of LACRALO, This email is to inform you that the agenda for the monthly call is already updated. In this call expondrn the following topics: 1. Presentation on the administration of IANA functions after the expiry of the contract between ICANN and the Government of the United States. Participacina charge of Len Sanchez (Mexico), Fulton & Fulton Partner and Co-Chair CCWG. 2. Market Study presentation about the DNS industry in Latin America and the Caribbean.Participacina over Emily Taylor, Editor of the Journal of Cyber \u200b\u200bPolicy (London) and part of the team member in charge of the team that realized the study. 3. Presentation on the perspective of human rights on the Internet. Participacina charge of Valeria Betancourt (Ecuador), Program Director Tuklu Policies of information and Communication of the Association for Progressive Communications - APC. The call details may be found on the following link: https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Telec... < https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Telec...> < https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Telec...> ICANN Adobe Connect room: https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/ < https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/> < https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/> Regards, Maritza ________________________________ From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org><lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:03 a.m. To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Meeting Invitation: LACRALO Monthly Call on Monday, 17 October 2016 at 23:00 UTC ** Please make sure you use the updated Adobe Connect URL shared below. Dear All, The next LACRALO Monthly Call is scheduled on Monday, 17 October 2016 at 23:00 UTC Spanish, Portuguese and French interpretations will be provided. For other times: http://tinyurl.com/j9uaokb The draft schedule (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/pxO4Aw NEW Adobe Connect Link: https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/ Conference ID: IN 1638 It is 1738 PT 5393 FR 1838 Wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi Please confirm your dial-out and preferred number to: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [Unknown.png] _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/11e344ac44.html --]]