From my point of view I believe once Josemis competing to reelection he nees to step down, a vice chair or other person shall conduct the election. It is a gormality that is releevant to the transparnce of the process. I understand the candidate can not call or oversee its own election, it is a matter of principle, just that. The majority of our countries Constitutions demands such independence. The rules are supposing a general election. Any election where the cnadidate is in the position of command needs to select someone to conduct the process, just that.
Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPad On 11/03/2013, at 00:25, Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Vanda, et all,
I would like to ask if there is any concrete and specific circumstance which merits that the LACRALO election process be called into question. As I explained in my earlier email, ICANN Staff has been updating the WIKI, monitoring BOTH Mailists and working with the LACRALO Secretariat and Chair, to ensure the process is transparent, fair and that ALL members of LACRALO had a chance to send nominations, support candidates, etc.
The election process is taking place according to LACRALO's CURRENT ROPs,( however good or bad), this is what LACRALO has at the moment, and this is the procedure that is being followed.
ICANN staff remains at your disposal so that this election process can move forward.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Silvia
Silvia Vivanco Manager, At-Large Regional Affairs Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: + 1 (202) 570-7119 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Cell/Mobile: +1 (202) 735-7011
-----Original Message----- From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of vanda@uol.com.br Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:02 AM To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: RES: LACRALO ELECTIONS From: vanda@uol.com.br
In these cases I think it is prudent to consult lawyers Icann because we are part of the structure of ICANN (ICANN pay our costs) to avoid problems as we had plenty of An LACRALO. I think Dr. Alejandro has knowledge to do so, aslo ask you did this before the end of this consultation process. Hugs
Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone
On 03.08.2013, at 20:15, Johnny Laureano <johnnylaureano@yahoo.com> wrote:
Estimados compañeros de LACRALO, Staff ICANN,
Es dificil pasar por alto los comentarios respecto de la legitimidad de este proceso eleccionario, me recuerda que se ha experimentado antes y lo doloroso que son estos procesos para todos.
Es por ello, de ser posible, sea oportuno aperturar por una semana el registro de candidatos para este proceso eleccionario y conformar un comité electoral, tal lo planteado por el Dr. Pisanty, me parece sensato y razonable.
Una apertura a estas dos acciones, coadyuvará a la legitimidad de los resultados.
Johnny Laureano AUI PERU - ALS
--- On Fri, 3/8/13, Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Guillermo M. Zamora - Abogado <gmzamora@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RES: LACRALO ELECCIONES To: "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan@unam.mx> Cc: "lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: Friday, March 8, 2013, 4:58 PM
Dr. Pisanty:
Quizás me exprese mal y dije algo que no quise decir, aunque no creo haberlo hecho, en ningún momento defendí a José, ni defendí nada, lo único que expresé y que reitero, es mi molestia personal por los términos
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/63856f26db.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es