[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: New Public Comment: Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Dear, we must pay atencina this comment public. What does the GAC? This: "The ComitAsesor (GAC) considers and provides advice on the activities of ICANN in relation to the concerns of governments, especially in areas where it may be an interaction between ICANN's policies and various laws and international agreements or where may affect issues of Public policy " We are the representatives of the end users, and there is a direct relationship between them and public policies imposed by governments. Please participate .. The short URL Access: http://xurl.es/kfcpx Best Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Fatima Cambronero Posted on: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:46 pm To: LACRALO Espaol Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice Dear / os, This topic has just been opened to comments ALAC. Please, if you'll be interested to comment and request from LACRALO whom we represent in ALAC LACRALO determined to vote so, take the opportunity to do so when the period of estabierto comment and has not been sent to Voting in ALAC. Otherwise it becomes very difficult to fulfill the mandate of the region. This theme, very briefly (you can read the attachments) implies one modification of the ICANN Bylaws in relacina suggested by the ATRT1. Currently for the ICANN Board is a separate recommendation by the GAC that decision should be taken by a simple majority (50% + 1), in addition to explain to Qulo esthaciendo. The proposed modification involves approved the same, now Board will have to make the decision to depart from a recommendation of GAC with a qualified majority (two thirds of the votes of its members). In my personal reading, this decision involves giving more weight to recommendations that the GAC will make to the Board of ICANN, because in order to deviate from these recommendations deberconcurrir the vote of a greater number of Board members. Quopina LACRALO? Must approve the modification (2/3 vote of Board members to deviate from recommendations GAC) or should remain to date (50% +1 of the votes of its members)? Qu policies may have implications this may decisiny quafectaciones cause users of the Internet, specifically in our region? Thank you very much. Best Regards, Fatima Cambronero ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: 8/18/2014 21:48 GMT-03: 00 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] New Public Comment: Proposed Bylaws Changes Regarding Consideration of GAC Advice To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Dear All, Please kindly note That the At-Large workspace for the following Public Comment request has-been created: Regarding Proposed Bylaws Changes Consideration of GAC Advice < https://community.icann.org/x/KgHxAg> Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge Twitter:ICANN_AtLarge < https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e514003327.html --]]