[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: asoto@ibero-americano.org Thanks Fatima excellent contribution. I also believe that at some point there is any contact. For example and talk about IPv6 and Internet of things, how to influence the latter on the use of IP addresses, but does not speak of any coordination with the / the multistakeholders involved in the definition of policies or with those responsible for distribution . It is true that there are layers that correspond only to a certain area and do not go there. Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Antonio Medina Gomez Posted on: Sunday, July 10, 2016 9:24 a.m. To: Aida Noblia <aidanoblia@gmail.com> CC: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Good morning to all. It is a document that provides knowledge and enriches and complements our work. The 10/7/2016 2:52, "Aida Noblia" <aidanoblia@gmail.com <mailto:aidanoblia@gmail.com> > He wrote: Thanks Alberto, it is interesting report brings statistics that can be useful. According to Fatima that the focus is on another layer, but it is also interesting to note that the layers intercontectan .. The report is of an economic commission and may think that focuses the user from their appearance as consumer .. but gives interesting statistics that relate to the right to access and others linked to equity, inclusion and other rights of some of the many stakeholders .. Greetings to all. aída On July 9, 2016, 15:28, Fatima Cambronero <fatimacambronero@gmail.com <mailto:fatimacambronero@gmail.com> > He wrote: Alberto, Thanks for sharing this document. It sounds a little logical that no mention of ICANN is not made, being that it was a document that was presented to a Ministerial (= government), in an agency / regional commission of the United Nations, right? Moreover, it is my understanding that this kind of organizations see the user as a consumer rather than as a stakeholder more involved in the discussion / Internet policy development. I do not know how others see it. On the other hand, as also discussed these days in the list, this report focuses primarily on another layer, telecommunications (with other stakeholders involved). Probably read this report will help us as an exercise in boundary layers mainly to understand what our role as users (if they really exist) within ICANN. Only some loose ideas to ponder .... Best regards, Fatima On July 8, 2016, 21:13, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > He wrote: It is a report to read, there are interesting data. There are statistics, various issues, and a little on internet governance, net neutrality, you need about these issues, and on other deficiency in governance, but there is no mention about ICANN ... http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-i... Best regards Alberto Soto _____ < https://www.avast.com/antivirus> Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses. www.avast.com < https://www.avast.com/antivirus> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/12482da8c8.html --]]