Re: [lac-discuss-en] The right to forget
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: aidanoblia@gmail.com Dear: From what I have learned so far, modestly, the issue is great practical importance today, an when it is difficult to power "Erase" all traces of Internet information that at some point between in the network. Whereupon exercise the right to be forgotten is of difficult application if the information is volcen network. The right to be forgotten can exercise the owner of the data (facts, etc.) that are broadcast on the network, is part of the right to the protection of personal data is governed by certain principles, including that of purpose of the data, informed consent, proportionality, FITNESS. The casustica is extensive. Deleting data from the database may be even harmful to the holder of the data, an in case of sensitive data. If it comes to health data (sensitive data) or schooling or grades in a university, the person that can turn Confa the respective Centre for a certificacinan many years after. In this case the injured will be the holder of the data, who is which also has the right to be forgotten and may not be the case interest in exercise, quite the opposite. The European project an terminde not read, contains limits hope in deletion of the data according to the different purposes. Focusing on the scope of ICANN, the topic will discuss in particular respect to the information contained in the Domain Name Registration, which are determined, appropriate to the purpose of the registry and MUST remain in the registry as the name and then estregistrado eliminated.The applicant shall be the holder of the right to be in the Register and be retired prior relevant trmite. The problem that I understand was considering these registry data is the appropriate limits of Legislation Of its data protection divulgacin, being that is open to the public registry. From what I have seen, the public records provide information various data of people and that is their function, for example in cases of the Registry of Deeds or Automotive, of Attachments. These records also report having data freely, who request it. The purpose for which the information is used and not a registry issue. The function of the Registry is to provide these data. No sensitive data is involved, which are specially protected according The legislation on data protection, but sson personal data. The control prevencino misuse of the data is the subject of another control different. There is a delicate balance between the right of access to information and the right to personal data protection and oblivion. It is complex generally solve because casustica is increasingly wide by complex world. I understand it is more acute in the current stage of the process, an unconsolidated and paradigms in formation, so that is not may have the temporal stability of the above .. Regards - Aida Noblia _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5969f89a8a.html --]]
participants (1)
-
aidanobliaï¼ gmail.com