[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Proposed ICANN Accountability Charter for Enhancing Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration From: apisanty@gmail.com Colleagues, possibly some of you. have received the news and call it Annex, which asks us to adopt the rules that funcionarun group working conditions to define accountability of ICANN. We regulate the standard by which our representatives vote Bern ALAC. I feel compelled to express some substantive aspects oposicina project and propose a modification: The document is rich in complex, typical of a large bureaucracy rules. It does not seem possible to simplify the rules prevailing in the environment but expressed the request to find a simplificacin. The substantive point, however, goes further allaunque is based in part on this observation: at no time is considered that an increase in the rules of transparency and accountability can cost in operaciny effectiveness of ICANN in their substantive functions. When operating as the proposal is contrary to the interests of users Internet and in particular the system user name domain, which records payments with our finance virtually entire system. What primarily interested users that the DNS is resolved biunvoca way domain names with high levels of performance, and extreme security, stability and resiliency. In the background, applicable only to a subset of users, processes matter ICANN are simple and predictable, from minor adjustments to the legal instruments to the creation of new domain names. The baroque system of accountability that has been created with ATRT processes 1 and 2 is itself quite complex and expensive and produces distractions of the substantive task. The new round to start estpor have all followed pronsticos aadiendo layers of complexity. So let me make a simple proposal: "add criteria considerarn that the impact on the effectiveness, efficiency and costs substantive processes of ICANN facing Internet users. " Hope this will be taken up directly without the convolutions with a similar proposal made during the ATLAS II farce was transformed in the demand for "contributions to the efficacy of ICANN "in" greater listening ICANN ALAC for their recommendations have efficacy. " Best regards, Alejandro Pisanty ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: Wed, November 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert - Proposed Charter for Enhancing ICANN Accountability Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-11-05-en ------------------------------ Proposed ICANN Accountability Charter for Enhancing Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration 5 November 2014 On 3 November 2014, the Drafting Team That was FORMED by the ICANN community to Develop a charter for the ICANN Accountability Enhancing Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) distributed to charter for adoption by Organizations chartering. The charter includes, Among other things, to problem statement, goals & Objectives, Scope, and Proposed areas for work. The CCWG STI is expected to organize activities in two Work Streams Enhancing consistent With The Revised ICANN Accountability Process < https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>: * Work Stream 1 *: Enhancing ICANN-mechanisms focused on accountability That must be in place-committed to or Within the time frame of the IANA Stewardship Transition; and * * Work Stream 2: Addressing accountability focused on topics for Which a timeline for Developing solutions and full Implementation May extend beyond the IANA Stewardship Transition. Next Steps Each ICANN Supporting Organization (SO) and Advisory Committee (AC) is expected to Consider Proposed charter During the upcoming November STI meeting (s). Following the adoption of the charter, chartering Organizations are expected to identify identity Their representative members to serve on the CCWG (Each chartering organization will appoint a minimum of 2 and a maximum of Five members to the CCWG). In Addition, a call for volunteers to join the CCWG Will Be Launched, So THAT In This effort anyone interested join and May Participate. The CCWG STI is expected to commence in late Deliberations November or early December. All members < https://community.icann.org/x/TwHxAg> Known as the "Cross Community Group" will be added to the CCWG as Participants, UNLESS some are appointed by chartering Organizations to serve as members or decides not to join this effort. Drafting Team Background Considering the short timeframe ahead and the relation of part of the Accountability to the IANA work Stewardship Transition process, the Drafting Team Worked on an expedited basis to Develop the charter. The publication date to align WAS Identified With The November meetings of ICANN's SOs and ACs, to allow for the question of adoption to CCWG charter be discussed. For details of each of the Drafting Team's meetings, Including interim draft versions of the charter, please see here < https://community.icann.org/x/kCjxAg>. The Drafting Team ICANN51 WAS FORMED following the meeting and includes members appointed by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), Address Supporting Organization (ASO), Country Code Supporting Organization (CcNSO), Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) and Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) .1 <# 1498271ed7b0f35e_foot1> In Addition, one representative from outside the ICANN SO / AC structure joined the Drafting Team to Ensure That the charter defined an inclusive process for the Broader community. For a full list of Drafting Team members, please see here < https://community.icann.org/x/jCjxAg>. Additional Information The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has Requested That ICANN "convene a multistakeholder process to Develop a Plan US government to transition the stewardship role "with regard to the IANA Functions and related root zone management. In making its announcement, the NTIA Specified Proposal That the transition must have broad community support and meet the following Principles: - Support and Enhance the multistakeholder model - Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS - Meet the needs and expectation of the customers and partners of Global the IANA services - Maintain the openness of the Internet. Also NTIA Specified That it would not accept a Proposal That Replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or an Intergovernmental organization solution. During discussions around the transition process, the community raised the Broader topic of the impact of the change on ICANN's accountability. The Enhancing Accountability process WAS ICANN finalized and posted on 10 October 2014, and can be found here < https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>. The scope of the ICANN Enhancing Accountability process is defined as Ensuring That Remains ICANN accountable in the Absence of Its historical contractual relationship With The US Government and the Perceived backstop With regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by That role, process: such as the renewal of the IANA functions contract. It calls for an examination, from an organizational perspective, of how ICANN's accountability Broader-mechanisms to address Should be Strengthened The Absence of Its historical contractual relationship With The US Government, treats including looking at Strengthening Existing accountability -mechanisms (eg, the ICANN Bylaws and the Affirmation of Commitments < https://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/aoc/affirmation-of-commitments-30s...> ). Links to additional information: Proposed Charter < https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/49359098/Enhancing%20ICANN%...> [DOC, 67 KB] Drafting Team Wiki < https://community.icann.org/x/XQHxAg> Revised ICANN Enhancing Accountability Process < https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en> For Further information, Please contact accountability-staff@icann.org. ------------------------------ 1 <# 1498271ed7b0f35e_note1> RSSAC and SSAC Were invited to Participate in the Drafting Team, but Were Unable to join the effort. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/281b04a2d3.html --]]