[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Proposed ICANN Accountability Charter for Enhancing Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration From: vanda@uol.com.br Alexander, all I fully agree with Alex posed. We should be allies position to provide an adherent to Thinking of LACRALO. It seems to me also very burocrtica all proposal and think if you draw attention to it and think about costs reducing efficiency is important but is looking for a commitment transparency. I think that transparency is a process that may be broader than he wants but cuestin is for? Each item to be published debese I think its relevance to the community or the process becomes really who publishes ineffective without interest to those who read. Alejandro I am allowed, I think his proposal "add criteria considerarn that the impact on the effectiveness, efficiency and costs Substantive processes of ICANN facing Internet users must be straightened to the group, and in addition to do it yourself I will do to ensure it is more an ode source. I think Leon if AGREE TO these points could do it too. This is very important that the transparency and accountability to prestacin community has at this same community focus and balance between costs that are meaningful to the community. For example, excessive costs in transparency may result in a loss of resources for regional groups, is more relevant ascual for regional community? Having knowledge of what is the expenditure blue envelopes (and to make selections hire someone ) Or pay for a session of capacitacin in our region? This balance very well defined Alejandro's suggestion seems very relevant. Hugs to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for Any typos. On 11/06/14 2:30, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty@gmail.com> wrote:

Colleagues,

Some of you might. Have received the news and call it Annex, which asks us to adopt the rules that funcionarun group Working conditions defining accountability of ICANN.

We need to standardize the criteria by which our representatives Bern Vote ALAC.

I find myself compelled to express some substantive aspects oposicina The project and propose a modification:

The document is rich in complex rules, typical of a large bureaucracy. It does not seem possible to simplify the rules prevailing in the environment but Express's request to find a simplificacin.

The substantive point, however, goes further allaunque is based in part on This observation: at no time is considered that an increase in the Rules of transparency and accountability can cost in Operaciny effectiveness of ICANN in their substantive functions.

When running as the proposal is contrary to the interests of Users Internet and in particular the system users names Domain, which records payments with our finance virtually Whole system.

What primarily interested users that the DNS is resolved Biunvoca way domain names with high levels of performance, And Extreme security, stability and resiliency. In the background, Applicable only to a subset of users, processes matter ICANN are simple and predictable, from minor adjustments to the Legal instruments to the creation of new domain names.

The Baroque system of accountability that has been created with ATRT processes 1 and 2 is itself quite complex and expensive and produces Distraction from the substantive work. The new round to start estpor Has all pronsticos follow aadiendo layers of complexity.

So let me make a simple proposal: "add criteria Considerarn that the impact on the effectiveness, efficiency and costs Substantive ICANN processes facing Internet users. "

I hope this will be taken up directly without the convolutions with That a similar proposal made during the ATLAS II farce Was transformed in demand for "contributions to the effectiveness of ICANN "in" greater listening ICANN ALAC for their recommendations Have efficacy. "

Best regards,

Alejandro Pisanty ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Date: Wed, November 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert - Proposed Charter for Enhancing ICANN Accountability Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration To: "alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org" < Alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>

[image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-11-05-en ------------------------------ Proposed Charter for Enhancing ICANN Accountability Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Submitted for Consideration

5 November 2014

On 3 November 2014, the Drafting Team that was formed by the ICANN community to develop a charter for the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) distributed a charter for adoption by chartering organizations. The charter includes, among other things, a problem statement, goals & objectives, scope, and proposed areas for work. The CCWG is expected to organize its activities in two Work Streams, consistent with the Revised Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>:

*Work Stream 1*: focused on mechanisms enhancing ICANN accountability that must be in place or committed to within the time frame of the IANA Stewardship Transition; and *Work Stream 2*: focused on addressing accountability topics for which a timeline for developing solutions and full implementation may extend beyond the IANA Stewardship Transition.

Next Steps

Each ICANN Supporting Organization (SO) and Advisory Committee (AC) is expected to consider the proposed charter during its upcoming November meeting(s). Following the adoption of the charter, chartering organizations are expected to identify their representative members to serve on the CCWG (each chartering organization will appoint a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 5 members to the CCWG). In addition, a call for volunteers to join the CCWG will be launched, so that anyone interested in this effort may join and participate. The CCWG is expected to commence its deliberations in late November or early December.

All members <https://community.icann.org/x/TwHxAg> of the group formerly known as the "Cross Community Group" will be added to the CCWG as participants, unless some are appointed by chartering organizations to serve as members or decide not to join this effort. Drafting Team Background

Considering the short timeframe ahead and the relation of part of the Accountability work to the IANA Stewardship Transition process, the Drafting Team worked on an expedited basis to develop the charter. The publication date was identified to align with the November meetings of ICANN's SOs and ACs, to allow for the question of CCWG charter adoption to be discussed. For details of each of the Drafting Team's meetings, including interim draft versions of the charter, please see here <https://community.icann.org/x/kCjxAg>.

The Drafting Team was formed following the ICANN51 meeting and includes members appointed by the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), Address Supporting Organization (ASO), Country Code Supporting Organization (ccNSO), Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) and Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO).1 <#1498271ed7b0f35e_foot1> In addition, one representative from outside the ICANN SO/AC structure joined the Drafting Team to ensure that the charter defined an inclusive process for the broader community. For a full list of Drafting Team members, please see here <https://community.icann.org/x/jCjxAg>. Additional Information

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has requested that ICANN "convene a multistakeholder process to develop a plan to transition the U.S. government stewardship role" with regard to the IANA Functions and related root zone management. In making its announcement, the NTIA specified that the transition proposal must have broad community support and meet the following principles:

- Support and enhance the multistakeholder model - Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS - Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA services - Maintain the openness of the Internet.

NTIA also specified that it would not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or an intergovernmental organization solution.

During discussions around the transition process, the community raised the broader topic of the impact of the change on ICANN's accountability. The Enhancing ICANN Accountability process was finalized and posted on 10 October 2014, and can be found here <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>. The scope of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process is defined as ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government and the perceived backstop with regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by that role, such as the renewal process of the IANA functions contract. It calls for an examination, from an organizational perspective, of how ICANN's broader accountability mechanisms should be strengthened to address the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government, including looking at strengthening existing accountability mechanisms (e.g., the ICANN Bylaws and the Affirmation of Commitments <https://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/aoc/affirmation-of-commitments- 30sep09-en.htm> ). Links to additional information:

Proposed Charter <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/49359098/Enhancing%20ICA NN%20Accountability%20FINAL%20-%20Clean%20-%20Charter%20-%20updated%203%20 November%202014.docx?api=v2> [DOC, 67 KB]

Drafting Team Wiki <https://community.icann.org/x/XQHxAg>

Revised Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en>

For further information, please contact accountability-staff@icann.org. ------------------------------

1 <#1498271ed7b0f35e_note1> RSSAC and SSAC were invited to participate in the Drafting Team, but were unable to join the effort.

_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce

At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/67086a6b97.html --]]