[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ / _ in _ = = utf-8 q desarrollo_Pa = C3 = ADs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro = = utf-8 llo_Mundial q =????????? from: aidanoblia@gmail.com Many Carlton Thanks. I copied down what it says page later. He theme is "what is development"? Human development? ... population growth? Good Sunday Greetings to all aída In the 2016 edition of its World Development Indicators, the Bank World has made a great choice < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&pr...> : It is no longer a distinction between "developed" and "developing" that There in the presentation of your data. The change marks an evolution in thinking about the distribution Geographic poverty and prosperity.But it sounds less radical if we consider that no one has ever accepted a definition of these terms in the first place. The International Monetary Fund says its own < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&pr...> distinction between advanced and emerging market economies "are not based on strict, economic or other criteria. "The Nations United do not have an official definition of a developing country, despite label hit 159 nations. And the World Bank itself had previously simply grouped the countries in the lower two thirds of gross national income (GNI) in the category, but even that comparatively strict cut was not very helpful. "The main problem is that there is only so much heterogeneity between Malawi and Malaysia therefore are classified in the same group and Malaysia looks more The USA. Malawi, "says Umar Serajuddin, senior economist ONS World Bank. "When we group countries mixed together in the same group, it is not really useful. " Part of the story is the success of development efforts in the the last decades. Consider this graph plotting countries on a shaft infant mortality and fertility in 1960 and 2013. In 1960, there are two clear groups-one with low mortality and fertility, one much higher. In 2013, countries have converged in a much tighter group. On May 22, 2016, 13:07, <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> He wrote:

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]]

Asunto: El abandono del BM desarrollados / en desarrollo País paradigma de Indicadores de Desarrollo Mundial De: carlton.samuels@gmail.com

La referencia a uno de mis personajes favoritos - Sir Humphrey - a un lado, algún burócrata ilustrada en la calle M está dando cuenta humana el desarrollo es una mezcla de verdades, algunos no miden en puramente económico ¡condiciones! Por ejemplo, algunas de las personas más tontas de la suciedad de la cristiandad son hasta ¡Norte!

http://qz.com/685626/the-world-bank-is-eliminating-the-term-developing-count...

Um, ¿qué va a hacer ahora la ICANN, es una buena pregunta!

-Carlton

============================== Un Carlton Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * =============================

[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8985b22f04.html --]]