[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? Q = iso-8859-1 El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ = = iso-8859-1 q / _ EDs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro en_desarrollo_Pa = = = iso-8859-1 llo_Mundial q =????? from: apisan@unam.mx Ada, studying this subject beyond the possible propaganda, it should be noted that the distinction refers strictly to the publication of the World Bank data sense and has not announced what change in decision decisions. Be interesting to follow. In Mexico - and I think also in other countries in the region, at least Chile also ingres OECD) - decades ago that the distinction is solely partial utility . Utility has been lost is due to the achievements of development of our societies; that has not been completely erased, our failures. It is advisable, as always, read the document of the World Bank and not only the press release. Librarians know that the primary source has much to teach us and it is essential to go there. A classic example of acerda discussion of the meaning of the indicators of this type, although more especfico for our themes is that Jamaica systematically appears as one of the most developed countries based in user density indicator of telecommunications, one of the most highest in the world. It should be used as an indicator rather than the World Bank in our scope? what are the consequences? qu disparities have with other indicators and what are the implications of these disparities? What ICANN should do depend on the different use cases, according to the decisions you make based on this criterion. We must be vigilant. We can anticipate that the debate will spread and lead to new policies d. Eyelet our representatives to monitor them and report to us. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Aida Noblia [aidanoblia@gmail.com] Posted on: Sunday, 22 May 2016 11:17 Until: <lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Abandonment of BM developed / developing paradigm Pas World Development Indicators Many Carlton Thanks. Copied below what it says after page. The issue also is "what is development"? Human development? ... population growth? Good Sunday Greetings to all Ada In the 2016 edition of its World Development Indicators, the World Bank has made a great choice < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&pr...> The change marks an evolution in thinking about the geographic distribution of poverty and prosperity. But it sounds less radical if we consider that no one has ever accepted a definition of these terms in the first place. The International Monetary Fund says its own < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&pr...> "The main problem is that there is only so much heterogeneity between Malawi and Malaysia therefore are classified in the same group and Malaysia seems msa US Malawi," says Umar Serajuddin, senior economist at office World Bank statistics. "When we gathered together disparate countries in the same group, it is not really useful." Part of the story is the success of development efforts in the last decades. Consider this graphic charting passes in a shaft of infant mortality and fertility in 1960 and 2013.In 1960, there are two clear groups-one with low mortality and fertility, one much higher. In 2013, countries have converged in a group much more strict. On May 22, 2016, 13:07, <carlton.samuels@gmail.com<mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > Wrote: [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Abandonment of BM developed / developing paradigm Pas World Development Indicators From: carlton.samuels@gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> Reference to one of my favorite characters - Sir Humphrey - aside, sb burcrata illustrated on M Street is giving human mind development is a mixture of truths, some not measured in purely economic conditions! For example, some of the people most stupid dirt of Christianity are up North! http://qz.com/685626/the-world-bank-is-eliminating-the-term-developing-count... Um, what will you do now ICANN is a good question! -Carlton ============================== A Carlton Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, Planning, Government, Evaluation and delivery * ============================= [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/094509a94d.html --]]