[[-- Translated text (es -> en) --]] Dear Harold, The 5 stated principles represent an ideal state that should prevail in some future, is that correct? In that sense and thinking about the ridiculously long time horizon of the "Holistic Review", which aims for 2030, any statement of good intentions like this is Well. It is what is known in English as "motherhood and apple pie", something so generally accepted as good that no one can dare to object to it, and at the same time, so general that it is completely devoid of meaning. Point 1 refers to the entity (SO, AC, etc.) "doing what it should do" (and has already been objected to in comments to the document). It should be more specific for each entity; for example, for LACRALO and other RALOs, "produces policy development recommendations technically informed, applicable in the short term, robust in the long term, and product of a broad, participatory multisectoral deliberation, reflects of diversity, well documented and reasoned, transparent and with the representativeness and conflicts of interest of the parties fully clarified". THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN HERE. I do think this is a good principle, and that the community that supports it must be aware of how far already through what steps you are to achieve it; For example, the dissolution of the entity and its full refoundation with organizations capable of fulfilling the principle. The same analysis can be extended to at least the first 4 principles, and the contributions of the different entities in their contribution to 5. Alejandro Pisanty On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:59 AM Harold Arcos<harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:

Estimada Región,

Tenemos una *cosulta abierta en progreso* para dar una retroalimentación sobre los 5 Principios creados por el grupo del Proceso de Mejora Continua (CIP) que servirá de Marco al futuro trabajo de Revisión Holística, como ya lo han reportado nuestros delegados Carlos Aguirre y Christelle Vaval en pasadas reuniones mensuales.

*En el enlace que compartimos, podrá ver el contexto de esta creación, los 5 Principios y la pregunta:* https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uQf54kae3tI8gKP4agOwJFzGMYNJb4StoVCNn4rm...

Por favor comparta su Respuesta dejando un Comentario en el Doc o enviándolo a la Lista de Correo Regional, iniciando con el Asunto: CIP-LAC . . .

La pregunta a responder está al final de la Tabla ES-EN:

*Pregunta para consideración de Lacralo:* *¿Se siente cómodo con los cinco principios desarrollados por el CIP-CCG (derivados del Artículo 4.4 de los Estatutos de la ICANN) para que sirvan como base común en todas las estructuras?*

Estaremos compilando las respuesta a las 22UTC cada día empezando hoy;

Gracias de antemano por los aportes

Saludo fraternal

Harold _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico City Mexico +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .