[.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation
Dear Region In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON. We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC. The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233 For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email Best regards Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary
Dear All, Our understanding of this document is that it is being circulated for the purposes of ALSs to review and possibly support in their OWN capacity. I notice that LACRALO is written in as a potential signatory, hence my reason for raising a concern. In private conversations with Sergio on this issue and also via email on the LACRALO list I, along with Carlton and Dev, recommended that we await the results of the discussion between Amazon Inc. and ACTO. More importantly, we also made and continue to make the point that the lack of consultation being referenced is not ICANN's responsibility. That issue should be taken up with the governments in the Amazon Basin and even more specifically by the aggrieved parties who reside in the region itself. If this letter is to have to the imprimatur of LACRALO, an affirmation is required by a conference call where a far more nuanced discussion can begin. My personal opinion is that this letter runs the risk of conveying the impression that the signatories are oblivious to the current state of affairs. This matter has gone way beyond this stage Best regards On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:51 PM Harold Arcos <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
-- Lance Hinds Chief Technology Officer BrainStreet Group 287 'C' Albert St. Georgetown Guyana This message contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential and is the property of BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning. The information contained herein is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it . If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or take any action in reliance to the contents of this information or any part thereof and it may be unlawful to do so. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message from your system. BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning are neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor any delay in its receipt.
Estimados miembros de la lista, Manifestamos que este momento es el propicio para nuestra declaración y la apoyamos y la firmamos. Saludos. Lilian Ivette De Luque Bruges Representante ALS Ageia Densi Colombia LACRALO El 2 abr. 2019 9:48 p. m., Lance Hinds <brainstreetceo@gmail.com> escribió: Dear All, Our understanding of this document is that it is being circulated for the purposes of ALSs to review and possibly support in their OWN capacity. I notice that LACRALO is written in as a potential signatory, hence my reason for raising a concern. In private conversations with Sergio on this issue and also via email on the LACRALO list I, along with Carlton and Dev, recommended that we await the results of the discussion between Amazon Inc. and ACTO. More importantly, we also made and continue to make the point that the lack of consultation being referenced is not ICANN's responsibility. That issue should be taken up with the governments in the Amazon Basin and even more specifically by the aggrieved parties who reside in the region itself. If this letter is to have to the imprimatur of LACRALO, an affirmation is required by a conference call where a far more nuanced discussion can begin. My personal opinion is that this letter runs the risk of conveying the impression that the signatories are oblivious to the current state of affairs. This matter has gone way beyond this stage Best regards On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:51 PM Harold Arcos <harold.arcos@gmail.com<mailto:harold.arcos@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Region In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON. We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC. The document in .PDF version will find them with the name Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233 For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email Best regards Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en -- Lance Hinds Chief Technology Officer BrainStreet Group 287 'C' Albert St. Georgetown Guyana This message contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential and is the property of BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning. The information contained herein is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it . If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or take any action in reliance to the contents of this information or any part thereof and it may be unlawful to do so. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message from your system. BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning are neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor any delay in its receipt.
Hi Harold I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership? I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement. However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)" Regards Jacqueline On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
As a matter of process, I must chime in to agree with Jacqueline on this. It is, in my estimation, necessary to get support from LACRALO for publishing a statement like this. In order to achieve that, I imagine that some opportunity must exist for us to openly discuss the statement that we are supposed to fall behind. In the very least, LACRALO members must, by a majority of our numbers, indicate our support for this statement in order for it to validly sport the LACRALO sign-off. Failing this, I am not comfortable going on record in support of this statement. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jacqueline Morris Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:50 AM To: Harold Arcos Cc: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] [.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation Hi Harold I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership? I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement. However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)" Regards Jacqueline On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Region In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON. We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC. The document in .PDF version will find them with the name Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233 For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email Best regards Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
I also agree with Jacqueline, Lance, and Bartlett on this. This cannot be considered a LACRALO statement given the insufficient process to discuss the statement properly and support. If organisations want to support on their own, then as Jacqueline suggested change it from LACRALO to " Joint Statement from organizations in the LAC region" On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM Bartlett Morgan <me@bartlettmorgan.com> wrote:
As a matter of process, I must chime in to agree with Jacqueline on this.
It is, in my estimation, necessary to get support from LACRALO for publishing a statement like this. In order to achieve that, I imagine that some opportunity must exist for us to openly discuss the statement that we are supposed to fall behind.
In the very least, LACRALO members must, by a majority of our numbers, indicate our support for this statement in order for it to validly sport the LACRALO sign-off.
Failing this, I am not comfortable going on record in support of this statement.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
*From: *Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> *Sent: *Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:50 AM *To: *Harold Arcos <harold.arcos@gmail.com> *Cc: *LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [lac-discuss-en] [.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation
Hi Harold
I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership?
I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement.
However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)"
Regards
Jacqueline
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
Regarding the proposed statement: I do not support the draft statement since the statement is directed to ICANN for the ICANN board to not delegate .amazon. As Lance and Carlton has pointed out, Amazon Inc, are in sustained negotiations with ACTO and we should wait to review the outcomes of those negotiations. The core grievance in the statement seems to me to be the lack of multistakeholder inclusion such as civil society and indigenous peoples in ACTO where such civil society and indigenous peoples can raise their issues and be heard, seen and respected by the governments in ACTO. As such, any such statement should be directed to the governments of Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela calling on those governments for more inclusion of civil society and indigenous peoples in ACTO. Governments' treatment of civil society and indigenous peoples are not the responsibility of ICANN or the Amazon company. Regards, Dev Anand On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
I also agree with Jacqueline, Lance, and Bartlett on this. This cannot be considered a LACRALO statement given the insufficient process to discuss the statement properly and support.
If organisations want to support on their own, then as Jacqueline suggested change it from LACRALO to " Joint Statement from organizations in the LAC region"
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM Bartlett Morgan <me@bartlettmorgan.com> wrote:
As a matter of process, I must chime in to agree with Jacqueline on this.
It is, in my estimation, necessary to get support from LACRALO for publishing a statement like this. In order to achieve that, I imagine that some opportunity must exist for us to openly discuss the statement that we are supposed to fall behind.
In the very least, LACRALO members must, by a majority of our numbers, indicate our support for this statement in order for it to validly sport the LACRALO sign-off.
Failing this, I am not comfortable going on record in support of this statement.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
*From: *Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> *Sent: *Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:50 AM *To: *Harold Arcos <harold.arcos@gmail.com> *Cc: *LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [lac-discuss-en] [.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation
Hi Harold
I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership?
I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement.
However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)"
Regards
Jacqueline
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
Let the record show that Lance, Jacqueline and Dev cannot be successfully challenged on fact. A statement may not be communicated as a statement from the LACRALO membership without the membership indicating its support or not. There is a mechanism and a procedure for that to be determined. Neither the mechanism nor the procedure was exercised in this case. +1 to Dev's further statement. -Carlton Samuels ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 1:31 PM Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Regarding the proposed statement:
I do not support the draft statement since the statement is directed to ICANN for the ICANN board to not delegate .amazon. As Lance and Carlton has pointed out, Amazon Inc, are in sustained negotiations with ACTO and we should wait to review the outcomes of those negotiations.
The core grievance in the statement seems to me to be the lack of multistakeholder inclusion such as civil society and indigenous peoples in ACTO where such civil society and indigenous peoples can raise their issues and be heard, seen and respected by the governments in ACTO. As such, any such statement should be directed to the governments of Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela calling on those governments for more inclusion of civil society and indigenous peoples in ACTO.
Governments' treatment of civil society and indigenous peoples are not the responsibility of ICANN or the Amazon company.
Regards,
Dev Anand
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
I also agree with Jacqueline, Lance, and Bartlett on this. This cannot be considered a LACRALO statement given the insufficient process to discuss the statement properly and support.
If organisations want to support on their own, then as Jacqueline suggested change it from LACRALO to " Joint Statement from organizations in the LAC region"
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM Bartlett Morgan <me@bartlettmorgan.com> wrote:
As a matter of process, I must chime in to agree with Jacqueline on this.
It is, in my estimation, necessary to get support from LACRALO for publishing a statement like this. In order to achieve that, I imagine that some opportunity must exist for us to openly discuss the statement that we are supposed to fall behind.
In the very least, LACRALO members must, by a majority of our numbers, indicate our support for this statement in order for it to validly sport the LACRALO sign-off.
Failing this, I am not comfortable going on record in support of this statement.
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
*From: *Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> *Sent: *Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:50 AM *To: *Harold Arcos <harold.arcos@gmail.com> *Cc: *LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [lac-discuss-en] [.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation
Hi Harold
I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership?
I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement.
However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)"
Regards
Jacqueline
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
Hello Jacqueline In fact, we agree on the criterion of not presenting the document as a Lacralo Declaration if we are not all in agreement with the document and this was expressed by several members. Not everyone agreed. So the document was signed and sent as the convergence of the opinions of several civil society organizations on the Delegation. When it was sent it was made clear that it does not represent an official declaration of Lacralo, only on behalf of the signatory organizations. The two previous mails; *1.- Proposal Letter to the Board of Directors - Topic .AMAZON*, and *2.- [.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation*, surely generated a logical confusion for which I apologize. Many of us would have liked it to be a declaration of the entire Region. I share the link of the document published in the wiki as a historical input on the subject and which there are still ALSs who are expressing their support with the firm: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138233/Draft%20statement... I am at your service for any additional information Regards On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:50 AM Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
Hi Harold I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership? I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement. However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)"
Regards Jacqueline
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
Thank you for the clarification. Jacqueline On Mon, 8 Apr 2019, 3:55 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Jacqueline
In fact, we agree on the criterion of not presenting the document as a Lacralo Declaration if we are not all in agreement with the document and this was expressed by several members. Not everyone agreed. So the document was signed and sent as the convergence of the opinions of several civil society organizations on the Delegation.
When it was sent it was made clear that it does not represent an official declaration of Lacralo, only on behalf of the signatory organizations.
The two previous mails; *1.- Proposal Letter to the Board of Directors - Topic .AMAZON*, and *2.- [.AMAZON] LACRALO about .AMAZON delegation*, surely generated a logical confusion for which I apologize. Many of us would have liked it to be a declaration of the entire Region.
I share the link of the document published in the wiki as a historical input on the subject and which there are still ALSs who are expressing their support with the firm:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138233/Draft%20statement...
I am at your service for any additional information
Regards
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:50 AM Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> wrote:
Hi Harold I am not in agreement that any ALS's endorsement alone is sufficient for the statement to be endorsed as a LACRALO statement. If this is to be a LACRALO statement, should it not follow our procedures and be put on the wiki for amendments and comments and then voted upon by the membership? I think that the current process doesn't suffice to say that it is a LACRALO statement. However, I have no problem with it being put forward as a "Joint Statement of ALSes of the LAC region (as shown by the undersigned)"
Regards Jacqueline
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 4:51 PM Harold Arcos, <harold.arcos@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Region
In this way, we share the ICANN Board Letter and the LACRALO Declaration initiatives that together represent the arguments and positions of several organizations on the Delegation of the Geographic Domain Name .AMAZON.
We invite you to review it and, if you consider it, to endorse with your signatures no later than Thursday 4 April at 23-UTC.
The document in .PDF version will find them with the name *Position LACRALO on Delegation .AMAZON:* https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102138233
For quick review and download on any device, versions in .PDF format are also attached to this email
Best regards
Sergio Salinas - LACRALO President Harold Arcos - LACRALO Secretary _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
participants (7)
-
Bartlett Morgan -
Carlton Samuels -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Harold Arcos -
Jacqueline Morris -
Lance Hinds -
lilian ivette de luque bruges