RV: Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RV: Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework From: apisan@unam.mx Hello, Annex message about the working group ICANN geographic regions, which enters period for comments by the community. It seems important that we address the issues of developing ICANN policies in parallel to the designation of representatives processes that are in progress. The issue of geographic regions has previously LACRALO Attracted interest in this report and may follow awakening. I note that the report of the working group concluded that geographic regions is not possible to make a new scheme for ICANN regions, or perform major modifications on the current. This implies for LACRALO tendramos to stop considering the option of short-term reestructuracina composition of passes that are recognized in the region, and work for a major improvement in the communication and cooperation between the subregions of Latinoamrica and the Caribbean. The report also suggests the creation of a mechanism by which the passes may apply to be reassigned to a region different from that currently contains. The report suggests that this application is submitted by the government of that country and it is not clear how the opinions considerarn technics communities, non-commercial and industry of that country, or those of other potentially affected. I believe that this point may merit a detailed discusinms LACRALO. I ask the Carlton Samuels ample information about it, as l formparte working group to this conclusion, and, if there is interest, one with a process organized discusinms leading to issue an opinion by consensus LACRALO.sta, of course, should not be in contradiction with each member organization can express their own independently if not coincide. Best regards. Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of At-Large Staff [staff@atlarge.icann.org] Posted on: Sunday, June 23, 2013 14:59 To: ALAC Announce Subject: [ALAC-Announce] Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm> Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework 22 June 2013 The Geographic Regions Review Working Group, a community-wide working group established by the Board, has nearly completed its work develop developing recommendations to the ICANN Board for the continued use of the ICANN Geographic Regions Framework. The Working Group has produced Those recommendations in a Final Report That document is being shared Today with the community. According To the Working Group Charter, each Supporting community That Organization and Advisory Committee members to the Working Contributed Group will now Have the opportunity to formally review and comment on this document before it is submitted to the ICANN Board. The Working Group will During the workshop host upcoming Public ICANN Meeting in Durban, South Africa and briefings will be made available to the leadership of all Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees (SOs and ACs) as needed. The Working Group was Formed by the Board to (1) identify identity the different Which purposes for ICANN's Geographic Regions are used, (2) determine Whether the use of ICANN's Geographic Regions (as currently defined, or at all) continue to meet the Requirements of the relevant stakeholders, and (3) submit Proposals for community and Board consideration Relating to the current and future use and definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions. A full record of the Working Group's past reports and public workshops and presentations can be found at the Working Group's Confluence Wiki space < https://community.icann.org/display/georegionwg/Geographic+Regions+Review+W G+ - + Documents>. The Final Report will soon be formally shared Directly With The leadership of the SOs and ACs Participating in the Working Group. They will have a full 90 days after the finding of the Durban meeting to discuss the Working Group's recommendations With Their communities and, If They choose, to submit written statements back to the Working Group. Later This Year, after That exchange has taken place, the Working Group will formally submit its Final Report recommendations to the ICANN Board for consideration. A copy of the Final Report can be found here: * Inglés <http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/geo-regions-final-report-22jun1 3-en.pdf> [PDF, 287 KB] ICANN Staff Contact Robert Hoggarth ------------------------- Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/17fe56cdbd.html --]]
Dear Alejandro: I will be happy to participate in the discussion. However, I would suggest that the discussion is scheduled after the Spanish translation of the Final Report is released and members have an opportunity to read it for themselves. For those who will need background information, please help yourself to what you need from the wiki here: https://community.icann.org/display/georegionwg/Geographic+Regions+Review+WG... For those who would wish to read the English-language version of the Final Report, do access it here: https://community.icann.org/display/georegionwg/Final+Report+Development+Pag... Kind regards, -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, <apisan@unam.mx> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: RV: Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework From: apisan@unam.mx
Hello,
Annex message about the working group ICANN geographic regions, which enters period for comments by the community. It seems important that we address the issues of developing ICANN policies in parallel to the designation of representatives processes that are in progress. The issue of geographic regions has previously LACRALO Attracted interest in this report and may follow awakening.
I note that the report of the working group concluded that geographic regions is not possible to make a new scheme for ICANN regions, or perform major modifications on the current.
This implies for LACRALO tendramos to stop considering the option of short-term reestructuracina composition of passes that are recognized in the region, and work for a major improvement in the communication and cooperation between the subregions of Latinoamrica and the Caribbean.
The report also suggests the creation of a mechanism by which the passes may apply to be reassigned to a region different from that currently contains. The report suggests that this application is submitted by the government of that country and it is not clear how the opinions considerarn technics communities, non-commercial and industry of that country, or those of other potentially affected.
I believe that this point may merit a detailed discusinms LACRALO. I ask the Carlton Samuels ample information about it, as l formparte working group to this conclusion, and, if there is interest, one with a process organized discusinms leading to issue an opinion by consensus LACRALO.sta, of course, should not be in contradiction with each member organization can express their own independently if not coincide.
Best regards.
Alejandro Pisanty
--------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
________________________________________ From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of At-Large Staff [staff@atlarge.icann.org] Posted on: Sunday, June 23, 2013 14:59 To: ALAC Announce Subject: [ALAC-Announce] Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm> Community-wide Working Group Completes Recommendations for Continued Use of ICANN Geographic Regions Framework 22 June 2013 The Geographic Regions Review Working Group, a community-wide working group established by the Board, has nearly completed its work develop developing recommendations to the ICANN Board for the continued use of the ICANN Geographic Regions Framework. The Working Group has produced Those recommendations in a Final Report That document is being shared Today with the community.
According To the Working Group Charter, each Supporting community That Organization and Advisory Committee members to the Working Contributed Group will now Have the opportunity to formally review and comment on this document before it is submitted to the ICANN Board. The Working Group will During the workshop host upcoming Public ICANN Meeting in Durban, South Africa and briefings will be made available to the leadership of all Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees (SOs and ACs) as needed.
The Working Group was Formed by the Board to (1) identify identity the different Which purposes for ICANN's Geographic Regions are used, (2) determine Whether the use of ICANN's Geographic Regions (as currently defined, or at all) continue to meet the Requirements of the relevant stakeholders, and (3) submit Proposals for community and Board consideration Relating to the current and future use and definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions. A full record of the Working Group's past reports and public workshops and presentations can be found at the Working Group's Confluence Wiki space < https://community.icann.org/display/georegionwg/Geographic+Regions+Review+W G+ - + Documents>.
The Final Report will soon be formally shared Directly With The leadership of the SOs and ACs Participating in the Working Group. They will have a full 90 days after the finding of the Durban meeting to discuss the Working Group's recommendations With Their communities and, If They choose, to submit written statements back to the Working Group. Later This Year, after That exchange has taken place, the Working Group will formally submit its Final Report recommendations to the ICANN Board for consideration.
A copy of the Final Report can be found here: * Inglés < http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/geo-regions-final-report-22jun1 3-en.pdf> [PDF, 287 KB] ICANN Staff Contact Robert Hoggarth
-------------------------
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org
One World, One Internet
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/17fe56cdbd.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
participants (2)
-
apisan＠unam.mx -
Carlton Samuels