[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to From: apisan@unam.mx Natalia, thanks for spending the BALN. Go back, adding value: 1. Cul was your position in inmovilizacin ALAC on domain names subject to UDRP? 2. The position of inmovilizacin LACRALO on domain names subject to UDRP may articulate studying two poles: a. the viewpoint of the user who registers a domain name without any abuse and is accused of abuse in a UDRP. This user has interest in the domain name and continue to solve, allowing services to the last day that the UDRP has concluded that it must yield. b. the user's viewpoint challenging a domain name registration that affects you negatively. This user will probably prefer to leave the domain name to resolve from the first moment that your complaint is received by the UDRP provider for processing. An axis perpendicular to these two is the users who are not registrants, but depend on the Resolution of the contested domain name. How they swing their interests, assuming that the registration is abusive or abusive to controvertirlo procedure? This will only be resolved by defining the interests, and we take issues like due process and presumption of innocence. ESTs according to this approach? It's different approach is estaplicando in ALAC? It is very likely to be much more advanced. Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NEW PHONE NUMBER - NEW PHONE NUMBER FROM ABROAD +52-1-5541444475 FROM +525541444475 MXICO SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________ From: Natalia Enciso [natalia.enciso @ gmail.com] Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:35 To: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch CC: Juan Manuel Rojas, LACRALO Espaol Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to Thanks Juan Manuel for the tip. Alexander, you leave the link of Policy Development at-large https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Policy+Developmen... To start the discussion will be interesting to read your comments and knowledge on the subject. Yours sincerely, Natalia On August 17, 2012 12:21, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan@unam.mx<mailto:apisan@unam.mx> > EscribitbNL> Juan Manuel, thanks for this notice. The work you refer to in it, put a "lock" freeze, a domain name subject to a dispute under the UDRP, will seem of greater interest to Internet users to whom we represent, is not right? To start the work of the WG to appointments, takes out a few months ago a survey of "registrars" and among the providers of UDRP RESOLUTION, which can be seen in summary updated https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31174551/Survey+Findings+-+... To start a intervencin by LACRALO think it's important to see at least the following steps: 1. Our representatives to inform us qupasos ALAC ALAC esttomando about it. 2. That the President of LACRALO propose a work plan with dates, deliverables and responsible precise, assuming leadership. 3. May each of us explore within our organizations have qupuntos users view and quconocimiento and experience have people who perform procedures UDRP. 4. That lawyers LACRALO members, of which we speak both Carlos Aguirre These days, we share their experiences and tell us about how they have seen that users are affected, both positively and negatively, on different inmovilizacin cases of names under UDRP. 5.That both lawyers and representatives of users consider the regional effects especficos as the UDRP estreflejada in LDRPS when stas exist in the ccTLDs, and should be expected that changes in the UDRP eventually be reflected in LDRPS. Obviously this is a tentative proposal and I am sure other members of LACRALO more tucked in the market for domain names in dispute podrn do better. Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NEW PHONE NUMBER - NEW PHONE NUMBER +52-1-5541444475 <tel:%2B52-1-5541444475> FROM ABROAD +525541444475 <tel:%2B525541444475> FROM MXICO SMS +525541444475 <tel:%2B525541444475> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, University Avenue 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> [Lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ] On behalf of Juan Manuel Rojas [jumaropi@yahoo.com <mailto:jumaropi@yahoo.com> ] Posted on: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:37 To: LACRALO Espaol Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings Subject to The WG Locking of a Domain Name UDRP Proceedings EXTENDED Subject to comment period until September 4. http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/udrp-locking-25jul12-en.htm JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Social Communicator President - AGEIA DENSI Colombia Twitter: @ JmanuRojas Join LACRALO: https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5ae245c10b.html --]]