Re: [lac-discuss-en] ???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_de F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 dos_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gT?? = = iso-8859-1? q? LD_Espacio_de_nombres? =
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:???? = Iso-8859-1 3A_solicitud_de_comentarios q = FW = 3A = q = iso-8859-1 _Declaraci = F3n_de F3n_del_ALAC_sobre_la_introducci = _ = q = iso-8859-1 dos_caracteres_de_nombres_de_dominio_en_el_Nuevo_gT?? = = iso-8859-1? q? LD_Espacio_de_nombres? = From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Alejandro, the closing date agendmal comments, why not logr arrive on time. I agree in part with you and also with Carlton. But no with commentary by Alan, where deca that they had already been released domains two digits and ESTN being used and will not unfair freed ms. If hubiramos come in time and that there be consensus be released, I will say it is not wrong but the correction of a error. Best Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch [mailto: apisan@unam.mx] Posted on: Tuesday, 12 August 2014 24:01 To: Alberto Soto; lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for Comment: Statement of the ALAC on the introduction of two-character domain names in the New gTLD namespace Alberto, the declaracinbsicamente says nothing. And ALAC are already Voting. This issue has been on the table long. In LACRALO who could have more interest are those involved in disputed territories international and is not expressed. That suggests the conclusion that we really have a collective opinin formed and should vote in abstention. Of course there are also aware that they do not serposible subsequently filed a complaint and we will be devoting the situation to use existing codes of pas under new gTLDs: some protections for today ESTN names in the list of ISO 3166-MA and ningn future space on the second level to the regions involved created or recognized, or cambin name (in the last decade or two in Latin America at least three continental countries have changed names, or Whether this ssucede). Best regards. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty School of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Av,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto [Asoto@ibero-americano.org] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 14:43 To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] FW: Request for comments: Declaration ALAC on the introduction of two-character domain names in the New gTLD namespace Thanks to the quick response Dev. Dear, if you follow the thread that gives Dev, there vern reviews found on this topic. Already have intervened Ftima and Ada, as podrn see. I welcome your comments Best Regards Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of devtee@gmail.com Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 3:04 pm To: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD Namespace [[Translated text (en -> s) -]] Subject: Re: FW: Request for comments: ALAC Declaration on introduction of two-character domain names in the new gTLD Namespace From: devtee@gmail.com Dear Alberto, My attempt at a declaration ( https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg) two points: - Issues of safety and stability Absent any DNS related, and given the use of 2 strings of various gTLD and ccTLD, convenience is use more short domains potential registrants and two characters for other meanings should not be any restriction of Tags two character ASCII on the second level within the TLD as registration agreements (5 blocks Specification for the two labels of all characters in the second level, default) - The second preocupacin is with respect to the logic that is used to RSEP many applications excepcina the specification of register 5 Release 2 asking not strings of letters in the ISO list actual.Considero is erroneous because the ISO list is not static and periodically updated to reflect changes in the passes and territories. This gives rise to a potential gap in the future in which some countries and territories ESTN protected in the Specification for the 5, but future are not.This (in my mind) should not be and all the passing and territories should be treated equally. However, this second point has received several comments that if there consensus to any restriction by the RSEPs qusolo requests, especially since two labels of characters in the second level and ESTN happening for various gTLD and ccTLD? And if you leave the second preocupacin really have to say that the first preocupacin? Dev Anand On Friday, August 8, 2014 at 1:20 pm, <asoto@ibero-americano.org> I wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this subject to our Regin?
Thank you very much!
Alberto
From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m. To: ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
Dear All,
Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg> ALAC ratification process.
The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names the New gTLD Namespace Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments 11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org
ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru 20Gisella ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen 20Policy% 20Sta ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff@atlarge.icann.org>
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bdbbf18235.html --]]
participants (1)
-
asoto@ibero-americano.org