[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]


Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Blac-discuss-en=5D_=3D=3Futf-8 = =?iso-8859-1?q?=3Fq=3FRES=3D=C1=5Ftarjeta=5Fde=5Fvotaci=3DC3=3DB3n = =?iso-8859-1?q?_=3D =
From: cintra.sooknanan@gmail.com

Dear Lacralo members, 
 
I agree with Jacqueline, but there plows 2 points, which perhaps plows being 
overlooked - 
 
Firstly, our preferred candidate was indicated on the 24th in advance of the 
25th deadline and well in advance of the second round voting deadline of 
28th. 
Understandable While it is that to votes by our representatives would be made 
prior to these deadlines, it is unfortunate that to present ourvoice and 
our preference have been overlooked. 
Please notices I have purposely not used the term votes in this marries ace the 
ALSes did not have to votes but to rather to opportunity to voice to their preference 
or favored candidates. 
 
Secondly, to this point it appears the process you have been maligned and 
prejudiced simply because ALSes have not been reading the literature before 
them from both candidates. We again implore our colleagues to review the 
statements made by both candidates 
https://community.icann.org/display/DirCan/At-Large+Director+Candidate-Community+Forum+-+11.10, 
including to their follow up statements forwarded by our Secretariat. 
To choose candidates (to either through ignorance or laxness) only based on 
personnel contact or language is to indicator poor of our knowledge on this 
process and only serves to highlight bias. 
This mindset should be alien to Lacralo, we should seek out and promote the 
best representation based on our judgment of statements from the candidates 
and not be trapped by the impressions of to their to characteror to other 
constraints that we perceive to exist. 
 
For I thank you your consideration and good judgment, 
 
Sooknanan Arch 
Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society 
 
 
In Espanol- 
 
Considered members of the LACRALO, 
 
I am in agreement with Jacqueline, but there are two points, that perhaps go 
by stop - 
 
In the first place, our favourite candidate indicó día 24 before 
date límite of 25 and long before the date límite second round of 
votings of the 28. 
Although he is comprehensible that a vote by our representatives 
realizaría before these terms, is lamentable that stop to obtain our voice 
and our preference has been ignored. 
Consider that I have not used to propósito of votación term in this 
case as the ALSes does not have vote but màs an opportunity to express well 
its preference or of the favored candidates. 
 
Secondly, to this point it seems that the process has been slandered and 
ALSes prejudices simply because they do not have been reading Literature 
before they of both candidatos.Una time mà s, request to our colleagues 
to that https reviews the declarations formulated by both candidates: / 
community.icann.org// display/DirCan/AT-Large Candidatos-Foro Director 
of community - 11,10, including its pursuit of the declarations 
shipments by our Secretaría. 
In order to choose to the candidates (or by ignorance or laxitud) sólo one is based 
in the personal communication or the language it is a poor indicator of ours 
knowledge on this process and sólo serves to emphasize the slant. 
This mentality must be other people's to LACRALO, we must look for andpromote the best one 
representación on the base of our judgment of the declarations of 
candidates and not to be catched by the printings of his carà to cter or others 
restrictions that we perceived to exist. 
 
I give to thanks for his consideración and good judgment him, 
 
Sooknanan Arch 
Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society 
 
 
 
 
 
On the Sat, Nov 27, 2010 AT 4:49 p.m., Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: 
> Actually, there was not to proper votes, with credentials sent to ALSes and > under on, was there? If to directed votes was to be donates (and Dev said > that there wasn't), then shouldn't there have been to propervotes, and > also the weighted calculation ace stated in the LACRLO rules? > until Given that the 2nd round of voting goes the 28th, I think that > any ALS expressing its opinion before then is perfectly within the > timeframe of the election of the candidate for seat 15. How dog > expressing an opinion on the 25th, when first round voting went until > the 25th and 2nd round voting goes until the 28th be too barks? > Jacqueline To Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Hair net and > Free. (to after Chris Lehmann) > > > > On the Sat, Nov 27, 2010 AT 3:56 p.m.,  <sylvia@internautabrasil.org> wrote: > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > > > > Subject: =?utf-8?q?RES=Á_tarjeta_de_votaci=C3=B3n = > > F!
 rom: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > > Dear Jaqueline, > > Excuse by to have you respond to him before. > > I a.m. totally in agreement with you and you plows why day of mail22 > November© envià um to list soliciing one votación (Doodle) of > everything lacralo under that to their representatives votedby mandate. > > until Ace that did not become and 25 day mayoria of the commentaries were > in favor of Sebastien, I voté by à ƒ©l. > > They were not conjectures! And there am is mà s, some ALSs of theCaribbean > that were pronounced in favor of Alan did después of the voting > schedule. > > Greetings > > Sylvia > > _________________________________________________________ > > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > Secretary FLUI - www.fuilatin.org > > LACRALO-ALAC Member > > Latin America & Regional Caribbean AT-Large Organization > > sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > > > > > > > > -----Me!
 nsagem original > > Of: nome of jam@jacquelinemorris.com la!
 c-discus
s-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post > > Shipment command post: sixth-feira, 26 of novembro of 2010 12:02 > > It stops: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Assunto: Re: card of votación > > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > > > > Subject: Re: card of votación > > Of: jam@jacquelinemorris.com > of my spera account à ƒ, había on equal > levels of the aid stops > both > > Sebastien and Alan - conté 6 for Alan and 7 for Sebastien. > Puedotener faltó some, under that porqué I a.m. suitablewith the to order of > Alex to civilian employee counts, under that we know the votes true of the ALSes, > and not ace soon ace to conjecture. > > > > Jacqueline To Morris > > oxÃÆ'Ã'­geno TecnologÃÆ'Ã'­a must be like the: Ubicuo, necessary, hair net > and frees. > > (despuÃ!
 Į '©s of Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > > > > > > Fri, of nov the 26 of 2010 in 9:52, <joseluis@barzallo.com> escribiÃÆ'Ã'³: > > > [ [ - - translated text (is - >)--]] of in > > > > subject: Re: > > card of votaciÃÆ'Ã'³n > of: joseluis@barzallo.com > > compaÃÆ'Ã'±eros > > wanted > > > Â > like one estÃÆ ' leaving to votes, exists to certain mechanism to do > it directly? > since then > despuÃÆ '©s of which a > reacondicionamiento of the received insumos we there are toyou decide to to me the aid > to > Sebastien Bachollet. > > Hot Greetings > > Jose Luis > Barzallo > > AEDIT > > www.aedit.org.ec > > Columbus 535 > and 6 of December > Edif. CristÃÆ'Ã'³bal Columbus Of. 602> Telf: (593 > 2) 2528774/ 2544464 > fax: 593 2 2564530 > email: > joseluis@barzallo.com > Exempt Ecuador &g!
 t; CONFIDENTIAL > > INFORMACIÃÆ'"n: PROHIBE the DIFUSIÃ!
 ƒÂƒÃ†'"n
, COMMUNICATIONOr > PUBLICACIÃÆ'"n > > OF THIS INFORMACIÃÆ'"n to THIRD WITHOUTthe EXPRESS AUTORIZACIÃÆ'"n ÃÆ'Ã'‰L > INSIDE > WRITING and OF > BARZALLO and LAWYERS OF BARZALLO.THIS > INFORMACIÃÆ'Ã'Æ'âÃ'â'¬Ã'Å"N IS DUE TO KEEP WITH > SECURITIES WHEN THE EAST THAT > IS NOT USED. IF YOU PLOWS NOT the ADRESSEE > OF THIS email,YOU DEBERA TO > ERASE IT and TO GIVE IT to DETRÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Âà ' S tothe TRANSMITTER > a! > > nd PODRA NOT TO READ, > To the Copy Or TO DISTRIBUTE YOUR ANNEXED and > CONTAINED SALARY. CUALQUIEROPINIONEXPRESSED INSIDE >! > > THIS MESSAGE, NOT NOT NECESSARILY CORRESPONDS to ITS AUTHOR and > ToBARZALLO and > BARZALLO. LAWYERS > > > original -----Mensaje > > of: lacquer-to discuss is - bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ > mailto:lac-discuss-is - bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] in name of & > gt;sylvia@internautabrasil.org <gt%3Bsylvia@internautabrasil.org> >!
 ; > sent: Friday, 26 of November of 2010 7:51 > stops: ' Alexander Pisanty ' > > CENTÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Âà ' METER CÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Ã  BICO: > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: [ lacquer-discuss-is ] > TRACK OF CATTLES: QUARTER FOR LOSDOCE: cÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'³moà ƒ Æ ' '  > is going to > votes? > > > to dear CompaÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'±eros: > Segun all the post office > sent to the list of LACRALO by you COM > the commentaries in the > candidates, and by my personal convictions, I have > voted to Sebastien. > immediately >, > Syliva > > _________________________________________________________ >Sylvia > Herlein Leite > secretary FLUI - www.fuilatin.org > Member of > LACRALO-ALAC & > > gt; Latin©rich AmÃÆ'Ã'Æ' and OrganizaciÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'³n En-Grande Of > original the Regional Caribbean > sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > &!
 gt; > > of -----Mensagem > of: lacquer-to discuss is !
 - > boun
ces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] commando post > nome of Alexander > > post of commando sent of Pisanty: fifth-feira, 25 of novembro of > 201021:08 > stops: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > centÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'­metro > cÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'ºbico: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: [ > lacquer-discuss-is ] QUARTER FOR the TWELVE: to cÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'³mo goes à ƒ Æ ' '  > > votes? > > hello colleagues, and in the individual that is going > to exert inthe of the votes > selecciÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'³n > IN Great: > à ƒ Æ ' '  > > we plows not on the last hours to votes? > à ƒ Æ ' '  > quÃÆ'Ã'Æ'© > conclusions there are reached that they plows going to votes? > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .! > >. . . . . . . .!
  > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av Univer! > > sity. 30 > > 00, 04510 xico©xico MÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Â DF©MÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Â > > Tels. > +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * my blog of blog/My: > http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * you promarry of LinkedIn towards > outside: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitte > > r.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/ÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Ã<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%83%C6%92%C3%82%C6%92%C3%83>â €   > '<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%83> > ' 106C0C8614 > > > * xico sees ISOC©MÃÆ'Ã'Æ'Â, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC > http://www.isoc.org > * participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org... >. . . . . . . . . >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [[ > - - original !
 text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7Ã<h!
 ttp://mm
.icann.org/transbot_archive/7%C3%83>£bed77dd.html > > --]] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > list thatenvÃÆ'Ã'Æ'ÂÃ'­a > lacquer-to discuss-the! > > c-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/27df97be42.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ã07c84b10.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-in mailing list > > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > !
 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-in mailing list > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > 
_______________________________________________ 




[[--Original text (es)
http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0a674d3a42.html
--]]