Nov. 27, 2010
9:37 p.m.
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5Blac-discuss-en=5D_=3D=3Futf-8 = =?iso-8859-1?q?=3Fq=3FRES=3D=C1=5Ftarjeta=5Fde=5Fvotaci=3DC3=3DB3n = =?iso-8859-1?q?_=3D = From: cintra.sooknanan@gmail.com Dear Lacralo members, I agree with Jacqueline, but there plows 2 points, which perhaps plows being overlooked - Firstly, our preferred candidate was indicated on the 24th in advance of the 25th deadline and well in advance of the second round voting deadline of 28th. Understandable While it is that to votes by our representatives would be made prior to these deadlines, it is unfortunate that to present ourvoice and our preference have been overlooked. Please notices I have purposely not used the term votes in this marries ace the ALSes did not have to votes but to rather to opportunity to voice to their preference or favored candidates. Secondly, to this point it appears the process you have been maligned and prejudiced simply because ALSes have not been reading the literature before them from both candidates. We again implore our colleagues to review the statements made by both candidates https://community.icann.org/display/DirCan/At-Large+Director+Candidate-Community+Forum+-+11.10, including to their follow up statements forwarded by our Secretariat. To choose candidates (to either through ignorance or laxness) only based on personnel contact or language is to indicator poor of our knowledge on this process and only serves to highlight bias. This mindset should be alien to Lacralo, we should seek out and promote the best representation based on our judgment of statements from the candidates and not be trapped by the impressions of to their to characteror to other constraints that we perceive to exist. For I thank you your consideration and good judgment, Sooknanan Arch Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society In Espanol- Considered members of the LACRALO, I am in agreement with Jacqueline, but there are two points, that perhaps go by stop - In the first place, our favourite candidate indicó dÃÂa 24 before date lÃÂmite of 25 and long before the date lÃÂmite second round of votings of the 28. Although he is comprehensible that a vote by our representatives realizarÃÂa before these terms, is lamentable that stop to obtain our voice and our preference has been ignored. Consider that I have not used to propósito of votación term in this case as the ALSes does not have vote but mà s an opportunity to express well its preference or of the favored candidates. Secondly, to this point it seems that the process has been slandered and ALSes prejudices simply because they do not have been reading Literature before they of both candidatos.Una time mà s, request to our colleagues to that https reviews the declarations formulated by both candidates: / community.icann.org// display/DirCan/AT-Large Candidatos-Foro Director of community - 11,10, including its pursuit of the declarations shipments by our SecretarÃÂa. In order to choose to the candidates (or by ignorance or laxitud) sólo one is based in the personal communication or the language it is a poor indicator of ours knowledge on this process and sólo serves to emphasize the slant. This mentality must be other people's to LACRALO, we must look for andpromote the best one representación on the base of our judgment of the declarations of candidates and not to be catched by the printings of his carà to cter or others restrictions that we perceived to exist. I give to thanks for his consideración and good judgment him, Sooknanan Arch Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society On the Sat, Nov 27, 2010 AT 4:49 p.m., Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > Actually, there was not to proper votes, with credentials sent to ALSes and > under on, was there? If to directed votes was to be donates (and Dev said > that there wasn't), then shouldn't there have been to propervotes, and > also the weighted calculation ace stated in the LACRLO rules? > until Given that the 2nd round of voting goes the 28th, I think that > any ALS expressing its opinion before then is perfectly within the > timeframe of the election of the candidate for seat 15. How dog > expressing an opinion on the 25th, when first round voting went until > the 25th and 2nd round voting goes until the 28th be too barks? > Jacqueline To Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Hair net and > Free. (to after Chris Lehmann) > > > > On the Sat, Nov 27, 2010 AT 3:56 p.m., <sylvia@internautabrasil.org> wrote: > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (is - > in)--]] > > > > > > Subject: =?utf-8?q?RES=ÃÂ_tarjeta_de_votaci=C3=B3n = > > F! rom: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > > Dear Jaqueline, > > Excuse by to have you respond to him before. > > I a.m. totally in agreement with you and you plows why day of mail22 > November© enviàum to list soliciing one votaciÃÂón (Doodle) of > everything lacralo under that to their representatives votedby mandate. > > until Ace that did not become and 25 day mayoria of the commentaries were > in favor of Sebastien, I voté by à ©l. > > They were not conjectures! And there am is màs, some ALSs of theCaribbean > that were pronounced in favor of Alan did después of the voting > schedule. > > Greetings > > Sylvia > > _________________________________________________________ > > Sylvia Herlein Leite > > Secretary FLUI - www.fuilatin.org > > LACRALO-ALAC Member > > Latin America & Regional Caribbean AT-Large Organization > > sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > > > > > > > > -----Me! nsagem original > > Of: nome of jam@jacquelinemorris.com la! c-discus s-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [ mailto:lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] command post > > Shipment command post: sixth-feira, 26 of novembro of 2010 12:02 > > It stops: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Assunto: Re: card of votaciÃÂón > > > > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > > > > Subject: Re: card of votaciÃÂón > > Of: jam@jacquelinemorris.com > of my spera account à Â, habÃÂÃÂa on equal > levels of the aid stops > both > > Sebastien and Alan - conté 6 for Alan and 7 for Sebastien. > Puedotener faltÃÂó some, under that porqué I a.m. suitablewith the to order of > Alex to civilian employee counts, under that we know the votes true of the ALSes, > and not ace soon ace to conjecture. > > > > Jacqueline To Morris > > oxÃÂÃ'Ã'ÃÂgeno TecnologÃÂÃ'Ã'ÃÂa must be like the: Ubicuo, necessary, hair net > and frees. > > (despuÃ! Âà '©s of Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > > > > > > Fri, of nov the 26 of 2010 in 9:52, <joseluis@barzallo.com> escribiÃÂÃ'Ã'ó: > > > [ [ - - translated text (is - >)--]] of in > > > > subject: Re: > > card of votaciÃÂÃ'Ã'ón > of: joseluis@barzallo.com > > compaÃÂÃ'Ã'ñeros > > wanted > > > ÃÂâ > like one estÃÂà ' leaving to votes, exists to certain mechanism to do > it directly? > since then > despuÃÂà '©s of which a > reacondicionamiento of the received insumos we there are toyou decide to to me the aid > to > Sebastien Bachollet. > > Hot Greetings > > Jose Luis > Barzallo > > AEDIT > > www.aedit.org.ec > > Columbus 535 > and 6 of December > Edif. CristÃÂÃ'Ã'óbal Columbus Of. 602> Telf: (593 > 2) 2528774/ 2544464 > fax: 593 2 2564530 > email: > joseluis@barzallo.com > Exempt Ecuador &g! t; CONFIDENTIAL > > INFORMACIÃÂÃ'"n: PROHIBE the DIFUSIÃ! ÂÃ'"n , COMMUNICATIONOr > PUBLICACIÃÂÃ'"n > > OF THIS INFORMACIÃÂÃ'"n to THIRD WITHOUTthe EXPRESS AUTORIZACIÃÂÃ'"n ÃÂÃ'Ã'â°L > INSIDE > WRITING and OF > BARZALLO and LAWYERS OF BARZALLO.THIS > INFORMACIÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÃ'â'¬Ã'à "N IS DUE TO KEEP WITH > SECURITIES WHEN THE EAST THAT > IS NOT USED. IF YOU PLOWS NOT the ADRESSEE > OF THIS email,YOU DEBERA TO > ERASE IT and TO GIVE IT to DETRÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂà ' S tothe TRANSMITTER > a! > > nd PODRA NOT TO READ, > To the Copy Or TO DISTRIBUTE YOUR ANNEXED and > CONTAINED SALARY. CUALQUIEROPINIONEXPRESSED INSIDE >! > > THIS MESSAGE, NOT NOT NECESSARILY CORRESPONDS to ITS AUTHOR and > ToBARZALLO and > BARZALLO. LAWYERS > > > original -----Mensaje > > of: lacquer-to discuss is - bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ > mailto:lac-discuss-is - bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] in name of & > gt;sylvia@internautabrasil.org <gt%3Bsylvia@internautabrasil.org> >! ; > sent: Friday, 26 of November of 2010 7:51 > stops: ' Alexander Pisanty ' > > CENTÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂà ' METER CÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂ⊠BICO: > lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > subject: [ lacquer-discuss-is ] > TRACK OF CATTLES: QUARTER FOR LOSDOCE: cÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ómoà  à ' ' ÃÂâ > is going to > votes? > > > to dear CompaÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ñeros: > Segun all the post office > sent to the list of LACRALO by you COM > the commentaries in the > candidates, and by my personal convictions, I have > voted to Sebastien. > immediately >, > Syliva > > _________________________________________________________ >Sylvia > Herlein Leite > secretary FLUI - www.fuilatin.org > Member of > LACRALO-ALAC & > > gt; Latin©rich AmÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâ and OrganizaciÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ón En-Grande Of > original the Regional Caribbean > sylvia@internautabrasil.org > > > &! gt; > > of -----Mensagem > of: lacquer-to discuss is ! - > boun ces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is - > bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org ] commando post > nome of Alexander > > post of commando sent of Pisanty: fifth-feira, 25 of novembro of > 201021:08 > stops: sylvia@internautabrasil.org > centÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ÃÂmetro > cÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'úbico: lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: [ > lacquer-discuss-is ] QUARTER FOR the TWELVE: to cÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ómo goes à  à ' ' ÃÂâ > > votes? > > hello colleagues, and in the individual that is going > to exert inthe of the votes > selecciÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ón > IN Great: > à  à ' ' ÃÂâ > > we plows not on the last hours to votes? > à  à ' ' ÃÂâ > quÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâ© > conclusions there are reached that they plows going to votes? > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .! > >. . . . . . . .! > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av Univer! > > sity. 30 > > 00, 04510 xico©xico MÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâ DF©MÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâ > > Tels. > +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * my blog of blog/My: > http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * you promarry of LinkedIn towards > outside: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitte > > r.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/ÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂ<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%83%C6%92%C3%82%C6%92%C3%83>â   > '<http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/%C3%83> > ' 106C0C8614 > > > * xico sees ISOC©MÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂ, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC > http://www.isoc.org > * participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org... >. . . . . . . . . >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [[ > - - original ! text (it is) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7ÃÂ<h! ttp://mm .icann.org/transbot_archive/7%C3%83>ãbed77dd.html > > --]] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > list thatenvÃÂÃ'Ã'Ã'ÃÂâÂÂÃ'ÃÂa > lacquer-to discuss-the! > > c-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/27df97be42.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (it is) > > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ã07c84b10.html > > --]] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-in mailing list > > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > ! > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-in mailing list > lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0a674d3a42.html --]]