FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace From: asoto@ibero-americano.org Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this subject to our Regin? Thank you very much! Alberto From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m. To: ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace Dear All, Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg> ALAC ratification process. The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg> Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments function 11 August 2014 20:00 GMT. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullr ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru 20Gisella ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen 20Policy% 20Sta ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff@atlarge.icann.org> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9723dd01cd.html --]]
Dear Alberto, My attempt at a statement (https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg) is to say two points: - Absent any DNS related security or stability issues, and given the use of 2 character strings by several gTLDs and ccTLDs, the desirability of shorter domains to possible registrants and that two characters are used for other meanings, there should not be any restriction of two character ASCII labels at the 2nd level within the TLD as per the registry agreements (Specification 5 blocks all two character labels at the 2nd level by default) - The 2nd concern is regarding the logic being used for the many RSEP requests for an exception to the registry specification 5 which asks to release 2 letter strings not in the current ISO list. I consider it flawed because the ISO list is not static and is updated periodically to reflect changes in countries and territories. This gives rise to a potential disparity in the future where some countries and territories are protected by Specification 5 but future ones are not. This (in my mind), shouldn't be and all countries and territories should be treated equally. However, this second point has received several comments that if there is consensus for no restriction, why single out the RSEPs requests, especially since two character labels at the 2nd level are already happening for several gTLDs and ccTLDs? And if the 2nd concern is removed, do we really need to say the first concern? Dev Anand On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this subject to our Regin?
Thank you very much!
Alberto
From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m. To: ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
Dear All,
Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg> ALAC ratification process.
The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments function 11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org
<applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullr ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru 20Gisella ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen 20Policy% 20Sta ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff@atlarge.icann.org>
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9723dd01cd.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
My views are on the wiki. The second concern is moot. What we have is an attempt to shut the gate after the horse has bolted. Too many 2-character second level domains exist to outlaw them now in favour of a future development; new countries and territories assigned a 2-character code that has no real meaning for them. At least I see .jm it has something of Jamaica there! Think the principality of Sealand or one of them 'stans' or khanates in Central Asia. So it is the first one that remains. I don't think a statement is necessary. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alberto,
My attempt at a statement (https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg) is to say two points:
- Absent any DNS related security or stability issues, and given the use of 2 character strings by several gTLDs and ccTLDs, the desirability of shorter domains to possible registrants and that two characters are used for other meanings, there should not be any restriction of two character ASCII labels at the 2nd level within the TLD as per the registry agreements (Specification 5 blocks all two character labels at the 2nd level by default)
- The 2nd concern is regarding the logic being used for the many RSEP requests for an exception to the registry specification 5 which asks to release 2 letter strings not in the current ISO list. I consider it flawed because the ISO list is not static and is updated periodically to reflect changes in countries and territories. This gives rise to a potential disparity in the future where some countries and territories are protected by Specification 5 but future ones are not. This (in my mind), shouldn't be and all countries and territories should be treated equally.
However, this second point has received several comments that if there is consensus for no restriction, why single out the RSEPs requests, especially since two character labels at the 2nd level are already happening for several gTLDs and ccTLDs? And if the 2nd concern is removed, do we really need to say the first concern?
Dev Anand
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this subject to our Regin?
Thank you very much!
Alberto
From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m. To: ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
Dear All,
Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg> ALAC ratification process.
The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names
in
the New gTLD Namespace Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments function 11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org
<applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullr
ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru 20Gisella ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen 20Policy% 20Sta ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff@atlarge.icann.org>
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9723dd01cd.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
A final draft version has been uploaded - see https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg which I think ( ;-) ) is better than the first draft. Dev Anand On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
My views are on the wiki.
The second concern is moot. What we have is an attempt to shut the gate after the horse has bolted. Too many 2-character second level domains exist to outlaw them now in favour of a future development; new countries and territories assigned a 2-character code that has no real meaning for them. At least I see .jm it has something of Jamaica there! Think the principality of Sealand or one of them 'stans' or khanates in Central Asia.
So it is the first one that remains. I don't think a statement is necessary.
-Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Alberto,
My attempt at a statement (https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg) is to say two points:
- Absent any DNS related security or stability issues, and given the use of 2 character strings by several gTLDs and ccTLDs, the desirability of shorter domains to possible registrants and that two characters are used for other meanings, there should not be any restriction of two character ASCII labels at the 2nd level within the TLD as per the registry agreements (Specification 5 blocks all two character labels at the 2nd level by default)
- The 2nd concern is regarding the logic being used for the many RSEP requests for an exception to the registry specification 5 which asks to release 2 letter strings not in the current ISO list. I consider it flawed because the ISO list is not static and is updated periodically to reflect changes in countries and territories. This gives rise to a potential disparity in the future where some countries and territories are protected by Specification 5 but future ones are not. This (in my mind), shouldn't be and all countries and territories should be treated equally.
However, this second point has received several comments that if there is consensus for no restriction, why single out the RSEPs requests, especially since two character labels at the 2nd level are already happening for several gTLDs and ccTLDs? And if the 2nd concern is removed, do we really need to say the first concern?
Dev Anand
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:20 PM, <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: FW: CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace From: asoto@ibero-americano.org
Hi Dev, please can make a summary of a few lines on this subject to our Regin?
Thank you very much!
Alberto
From: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: alac-announce-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff Posted on: Friday, August 8, 2014 11:07 a.m. To: ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace
Dear All,
Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, you Asked That a call for be made comments on the draft ALAC Statement on the Introduction of Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg> ALAC ratification process.
The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Introduction of Two-Character Domain
Names in
the New gTLD Namespace Workspace < https://community.icann.org/x/VqzhAg>
Please submit any comments on the workspace by using the comments function 11 August 2014 20:00 GMT.
Regards,
Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew
ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC
E-mail: staff@atlarge.icann.org
<applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullr
ich,% 20Vivanco 20Silvia%%% 20Ashtiani 20Matt% 20Liang 20Ariel%%% 20Gru 20Gisella ber, 20Nathalie%%% 20and% 20Peregrine 20Julia 20ICANN%%% 20Charvolen 20Policy% 20Sta ff% 20in% 20support% 20of% 20ALACmailto: staff@atlarge.icann.org>
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9723dd01cd.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en
participants (3)
-
asoto＠ibero-americano.org -
Carlton Samuels -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh