Hello All, You may view the "ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization" on its wiki workspace here, under 'FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC': https://community.icann.org/x/35U0Aw. For future reference, please be so kind to provide your input on the draft ALAC Statement during its internal call for comments¹ period and leave your comments in the wiki workspace of the draft ALAC Statement. In that way, penholder(s) can keep track of the community comments and take them into consideration when revising the draft in a timely manner. For every draft ALAC Statement, Staff send out a message to the alac-announce mailing list that has CALL FOR COMMENTS¹ in its subject line and indicates the method and deadline for submitting input. If you have any question/comment related to ALAC advice development process, please don¹t hesitate to contact me. Best Regards, Ariel Ariel Xinyue Liang Policy Analyst | Washington, DC Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype: ariel.liang.icann Mobile: +1 (310) 804-2761 Email: ariel.liang@icann.org Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icannatlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Olivier Crepin Leblond <ocl@gih.com> Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 9:43 AM To: "lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: Vanda Scartezini <vanda@etges.com.br> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization Hello all, let me make this quite clear from the outset: ALAC members are asked to vote on the Statement, not on the GNSO Review Report. The ALAC Statement mentions the points it agrees with in the GNSO Review report. It mentions the points it does not agree with and is pretty strong on criticising the Consultants about the fact it completely missed the opportunity to evaluate the GNSO Structure. The ALAC response is pretty clear about that. The call for comments was made on 15 July. The only ALAC member from LAC that commented was Vanda and her views were taken into account. The only other LACRALO member that commented was Carlton Samuels and his views were also taken into account. In formulating the ALAC response, I unfortunately received no other input from LACRALO members, despite requests for feedback. Kind regards, Olivier On 03/08/2015 15:18, cveraq@gmail.com wrote:
[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]]
Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization From: cveraq@gmail.com
Vanda: if you say "I intend to vote in Please though I personally believe, and HAD Such statement made, That the review itself was really weak and did not touch Relevant several points."
It sounds contradictory and the vote should be against?
Carlos Vera Quintana 0988141143 Sguemecveraq
El 2/8/2015, a las 19:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com> <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> escribió:
I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had made such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not touch several relevant points.
[[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e497ab67c.html --]]
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/ listinfo/lac-discuss-en