[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Reflexiones sobre la ELA criterios y expectativas Taskforce De: h.raiche@internode.on.net Hola Carlton Sólo una nota rápida - para gente como yo, sólo puedo hacer tantas llamadas al 0200 (no soy otra CLO), pero no lee las transcripciones de reuniones, y no participar en los debates sobre la línea, por lo que ser un poco cuidadoso en lo que se entiende por la participación. Dicho esto, las continuas disculpas - y nada más - debe ser un valor de cero Acebo El 09 de agosto 2015, a las 09:39 am, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> escribió:
+1.
The challenge is adjusting the structural underpinnings of the At-Large engagement in ICANN and the perceptions of performance. And that will be difficult, at best.
More to the point, we are not seeing the kind of innovative thinking about performance metrics that would make what you and I see as value come to the top.
Case in point. We had a recent situation in LACRALO where it was seriously proposed that if one sends an apology for non-attendance - note well, purely not attending - an online meeting, that should be counted as participation!
And, some benighted fella would claim offense if one were to reflexively say aloud that the notion as expressed offends even the commonsensical idea of what is stupid.
-Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround =============================
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote: Dear Alan,
agreed on all your other points.
On 08/08/2015 00:58, Alan Greenberg wrote:
3. The latter ones come to meetings, perhaps attend some meetings, enjoy the local offerings, and go home and forget about us until the next trip. THOSE are the ones that I have a real problem with.
And unfortunately whenever the time comes for having face to face meetings, we treat those people the same way as we treat the people who genuinely want to get involved. It is impossible to build a relationship with people who do not make the effort to keep involved in between face to face meetingsMy argument is that we should identify people who have a genuine interest in helping out and facilitate their involvement in face to face meetings, more often than at GAs every 5 years. So far, what I have done is to give excellent references to people applying for the fellowship program and whom I judge to be of real potential. But that's not enough since the program is only available for developing nations. This is why I would favour the ability for the ALAC to invite people from their ALSes to an ICANN meeting, based on a skill requirement. For example, the hot topic is about WHOIS, let's invite people whom we know to be privacy experts. The hot topic is about ICANN Accountability - let's invite people who run an ALS that has a need to impeccable accountability. etc.
Kind regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
[[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/77d86e8b05.html --]]