Dear Lance, Thank you for sharing this proposal. During the February 9 meeting <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/s65K_j4pNMwUsQ_3cs-ag5g7pnujGA1l5yRNYqRowb3pt...>, the discussion evolved toward an orientation to move forward with two specific teams and to close the remaining working groups. However, since then, there has been no observable implementation of that orientation, nor a defined process to carry it forward. In that context, the proposal you are now putting forward introduces a different approach, based on a single working group with subgroups, which was not the subject of agreement in that meeting. This introduces a lack of continuity with what was previously discussed and makes it more difficult to ensure consistency in decision-making. During that discussion, *I raised the need to establish a clear basis for evaluating the functioning of the working groups, including the request for a work plan and the definition of objective criteria to determine their continuation or closure*. To date, those elements have not been put in place. Furthermore, considering the time that has elapsed since this issue was addressed, there is still no implemented decision nor a formally defined process. This highlights the need to approach the matter with greater procedural clarity. From a governance perspective within ICANN, working groups are mechanisms for community participation. Accordingly, any decision regarding their continuation or closure requires a transparent process, supported by defined and documented criteria. The ICANN model is based on a *“bottom-up”* approach, meaning that decisions are built from community input through open and participatory processes. In the absence of a process that gathers community input and establishes a clear basis for decision-making, it is not evident that this principle is being reflected in this case. In that regard, I consider that any reconfiguration of the working groups would be appropriately supported if it is based on clearly defined criteria and on information that allows for an assessment of their functioning, including work plans. This would help ensure that decisions are taken on an objective and consistent basis, aligned with the governance practices of the community. Kind regards, Eunice Alejandra Pérez Coello El lun, 27 abr 2026 a las 10:29, Lance Hinds via LAC-Extended-Leaders (< lac-extended-leaders@icann.org>) escribió:

Dear Colleagues:

As per our deliberations, we decided to suspend the WG's operations due to tremendous inefficiency in how the groups are operating. Some groups have never convened, and the others have done limited work considering the period of time they have existed.

After a series of conversations with colleagues in the ICANN eocosystem, The most popular suggestion was creating one working group to coordinate activities by the RALO or the Board. If necessary sub groups can be created to address specific areas of interest. You can deactivate these subgroups when their tasks are complete. This should create a less unwieldy process and address the concerns raised about the number and effectiveness of the groups being created.

Please share your thoughts on this.

-- Lance Hinds Chief Technology Officer BrainStreet Group 287 'C' Albert St. Georgetown Guyana

This message contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential and is the property of BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning. The information contained herein is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it . If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or take any action in reliance to the contents of this information or any part thereof and it may be unlawful to do so. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message from your system. BrainStreet Technologies or BrainStreet Learning are neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor any delay in its receipt. _______________________________________________ LAC-Extended-Leaders mailing list -- lac-extended-leaders@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to lac-extended-leaders-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.