Hi all, I am a bit confused by the choice of comments from the IP regarding EGIDS 5 languages: * In some occasions (e.g., 0115, Bavarian (5)) they state that the languages should be removed from the refernce (sometimes with the result of eliminating the whole character) * In some occasions (e.g., 015D, Tswa (5)) they require additional comments for those languages. * In some occasions (e.g., 1E5B, Kabyle (5)) the languages are accepted without complaint from IP. I guess, according to our statement "Languages with EGIDS 5 may be included in special cases where there is additional evidence that it is in widespread use" we should alter our table as follows: * remove EGIDS 5 languages, if other at least two other references are available wiht higher score * keep EGIDS 5 languages, if there is one or no other reference available * add a comment to prove its widespread use for all remaining EGIDS 5 langauges Cheers, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp