I think Michael has it: "We just thought at that point that we have to do it that way, because the IP demanded it." Which isn't, at least in my mind, the same thing as saying that we had agreement that we should do it that way. Bill Jouris Inside Products bill.jouris@insidethestack.com 831-659-8360 925-855-9512 (direct) From: Michael Bauland <Michael.Bauland@knipp.de> To: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis" <dtantanaka@verisign.com>; "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org>; Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@iis.se>; Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:47 AM Subject: Re: [Latingp] Cross-script analysis Armenian and Greek, and overview slides Hi all, I agree with Dennis and his comments regarding homoglyphs. It was a team decision then to only consider homoglyphs (and not Dennis' personal view). This of course does not mean that all (or some) of us believe that it is the right way to do. We just thought at that point that we have to do it that way, because the IP demanded it. Now, with additional information at hand (especially the fact that some other GPs seem to have interpreted this much broader and seem to get through with it), we could discuss whether this is really the right/best approach. This should be one of the topics for our meeting next week. Best regards, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp