Hi Dennis, hi Mats, On 05.01.2018 16:02, Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp wrote:
Thanks Mats.
A follow up question, is there evidence that these two code points are used interchangeably in the languages the repertoire team analyzed? I ask because the IP will ask for more evidence of a variant relationship besides visual appearance. Per the Procedure “Generation Panels should ignore cases where the relation is based exclusively on aspects of visual similarity”.
I'm not sure we need additional evidence, because in this case it's not mere "visual similarity" but those two are actually the same. And I don't think we have another choice in the case of homoglyphs, but to make them variants. On the contrary, I think we had to argue if we wanted to not make them variants. Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp