Hi, on page 6 we write "Languages are restricted to natural human languages", but what about Esperanto? It's not a natural language, is it? I think it is a artificial, constructed language. Should we maybe remove the word "natural"? Or should we change it to something like: "Languages are restricted to natural human languages in active use plus the widely used universal language Esperanto." We sometimes write MSR-2 and MSR-3, and sometimes MSR2 and MSR3. Not a big issue, but we should only use one of them (should be easily fixed by the search and replace functionality). Esperanto has no number in Appendix A. I guess it should be 102 and all following languages should be changed to +1. Some smaller changes I already applied in the attached version: p5: I changed the colours to better match the colours of the map p6: Some minor edits (added articles; changed definition to defining) p36: Added an 's': sequence of code pointS Cheers, Michael -- ____________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 44227 Dortmund Germany Dipl.-Informatiker Fon: +49 231 9703-0 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 Dr. Michael Bauland SIP: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Software Development E-mail: Michael.Bauland@knipp.de Register Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728 Chief Executive Officers: Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp