Dear colleagues, We agreed previously that, if the Greek GP had come up withsome variants that we had not, we would accept them rather than argue thepoint. Reading thru the Greek LRG, itseems to me that there are a couple of issues we should discuss. First off, the Greek GP generally finds that a dot above, agrave accent, and an acute accent are variants. As a result, transitivity gives us variants for I, O, and U with dotabove and acute (in addition to the cases of C, N, and Z with acute vs dotabove) plus variants for acute and grave for various letters. The issue that I see is that there are a fewLatin letters which are not included simply because the Greek alphabet has no variantsfrom Latin for the base letter. But isteems to me that, as a matter of consistency, we ought to go back thru and makethose cases variants as well. Second, the Greek GP finds the opposite from our findingwhen it comes to underlining. That is,most of the cases of letters with diacritics below they are, via transitivity, going to bevariants of the letter without underlining. But perhaps (I haven’t gone thru all the cases yet) not all. Again, as a matter of consistency I think weneed to take another look at that. Bill Jouris | | Virus-free. www.avg.com |