Dear Colleagues, I would like to circle back to something we discussed in our meeting Thursday. When looking at Section 6.3.1.3 we talked about this entry: | Latin Small Letter I with Grave | 0069 | ì | ↔ | ỉ | 1EC9 | Latin Small Letter I with Hook Above | Blocked | As Dennis quite correctly noted in the Comments, we had determined that code points 0069 and 1EC9 were not variants. But as we later determined, we had found Latin Small Letter I with Grave and Latin Small Letter I with Hook Above to be variants. That's what this entry was for -- the code point names and glyphs were correct, just the Unicode number was wrong. Here's what I find fascinating. Clearly Dennis was looking closely at the entry. But closely as he was looking, even Dennis didn't notice that the glyph was Small Letter I with Grave rather than just Small Letter I. And yet, we have ruled generally that Grave and Dot Above do not create variant pairs. Something is very wrong here. Bill