Consistency in analysis

Oct. 24, 2019

      All, let me try to explain the problem of excluding certain code points from different sets when doing the analysis.

Let’s assume two scenarios for the hypothetical analysis:

Scenario 1:

Set 1 = {A, B}

Set 2 = {A, C}

For Set 1, it was concluded A is a variant of B.

In Set 2, it was concluded A is not a variant of C.

Then, the only resulting variant set is A --> B (symmetry implied)

Scenario 2:

                Set 1 = {A, B}

                Set 3 = {A, B, C}

                For Set 1, A is deemed variant of B

                In Set 3, A is deemed variant of B, B deemed a variant of C, but A not a variant of C.

                The resulting variant sets are A --> B, B--> C; and due to transitivity A-->C is also a variant pair.

My point was that by excluding a code point from the analysis can result in different result as to the variant sets identified.

Hope this helps clarify.

Dennis

Tan Tanaka, Dennis

Bill Jouris

Tan Tanaka, Dennis

tags

participants (2)