Dear colleagues,  As currently written, what we have provided are technical justifications for the decisions which we have taken.  What I believe we need to add as well are non-technical explanations for why we made the decisions, and our reasons for declining to consider the suggestions from the comments.  We can, of course, simply offer up the statement made in one of our meetings last month to the effect that a comment "Only represents on person's opinion."  I don't know if we want to be quite that frank, but we do need something which will tell a non-expert why we did what we did.  Bill On Sunday, January 2, 2022, 08:35:02 AM PST, Mirjana Tasić via Latingp <latingp@icann.org> wrote: <!--#yiv1679335040 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv1679335040 #yiv1679335040 p.yiv1679335040MsoNormal, #yiv1679335040 li.yiv1679335040MsoNormal, #yiv1679335040 div.yiv1679335040MsoNormal {margin:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;}#yiv1679335040 a:link, #yiv1679335040 span.yiv1679335040MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1679335040 p.yiv1679335040MsoListParagraph, #yiv1679335040 li.yiv1679335040MsoListParagraph, #yiv1679335040 div.yiv1679335040MsoListParagraph {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", serif;}#yiv1679335040 span.yiv1679335040EmailStyle17 {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv1679335040 .yiv1679335040MsoChpDefault {font-family:"Calibri", sans-serif;} _filtered {}#yiv1679335040 div.yiv1679335040WordSection1 {}#yiv1679335040 _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv1679335040 ol {margin-bottom:0cm;}#yiv1679335040 ul {margin-bottom:0cm;}--> Dear GP members,     Here is the agenda proposal for the next call.  Comments and suggestions are the most welcome.   Regards Mirjana -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Agenda for the Latin GP call on 3  January  2021, 16:00 UTC     - To  continue - finalization of responses to public comments for - Repertoire comments (GP members to comment the response on Onedrive) - Variant comments (GP members to comment the response on Onedrive   - Discussion about Latin Script  Root Zone LGR public comments , see the working document attached in this mail https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposal-for-latin-script...   - Underlining comments - Confusable - Capital letters - Numerals - Adding a reference to EGIDS scale - AOB - Change of criteria for inclusion of languages in the Repertoire   _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.