Dear colleagues,  Per the discussion in today's meeting, I have added rows 17-19, for D with circumflex below, to the Underlining Analysis spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19FZmntXOan_7LF0ckzKZNLrla0L8eC_GxWEf...  Please add your ratings for those glyphs.  Thank you Bill Jouris Inside Products bill.jouris@insidethestack.com 831-659-8360 925-855-9512 (direct) On Friday, June 14, 2019, 10:35:03 AM PDT, Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> wrote: Dear colleagues,  I've been pulling together the list of variants due to underlining, and I noticed something.  In every case where we did a full group review of a letter with "circumflex below", the final decision was that it was a variant.  But there was one letter (D) which did not get a full group review because, by chance, both the original two reviewers were folks who consistently didn't see the circumflex below as a variant.  It seems to me that, as a matter of consistency, if we generally see a circumflex below as something that cannot be distinguished from the letter alone, we should revise the finding for D to conform.  Does anyone have a problem with me making that addition?  Bill Jouris Inside Products bill.jouris@insidethestack.com 831-659-8360 925-855-9512 (direct)_______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.