I would suggest that the compromise might be manned webcasting. A little intelligent zooming, pointing & switching can work wonders for comprehension. Webcasting does not preclude post processing. j On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>wrote:
Eric:
On 07/07/2011 17:51, ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net wrote :
Streaming is good, it meets a specific need. However, it is also not accessible for those with (a) limited media access, or (b) limited context. This is where the post-processing issue is interesting. Rather than a meeting on an inscruitable subject couched in impenitrable language, a voice over and visual sequence could convey something that is accessible to a larger audience of interested persons.
As a plus, the post-processing provides an opportunity for voice over in langauges other than English.
As a minus, post-processing costs money. I think ICANN could run along an unmanned WebCam type streaming scenario for the time being because its costs would be nominal. Anything more than that is unlikely at this stage. Kind regards,
Olivier
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -