Eduardo Diaz wrote:
Sorry for the late answer...but at this moment I do not see the value, except that we should be allowed to participate in more than one RALO, i.e. LACRALO.
Frankly I don't understand why there should be any objection to this. An ALS may have voting privileges in only one RALO, but there is no reason that they should not be allowed to participate in more than one RALO's discussions as a non-voting participant. Doing this would not seem to require any changes to MOUs or operating procedures unless they're very restrictive. If any existing member of LACRALO wanted to participate in a NARALO discussion I wouldn't hesitate to welcome them. (Allowing an ALS to arbitrarily select which region they preferred should also be allowed, but would require many changes to the legal documents...) - Evan