Gordon, and interested Colleagues, While not specific to the issue of ICANN's Fellowship Program and its present absolute bar to Indigenous applicants from Canada, the United States, Mexico, Chile, Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia, the link below is useful, setting the issue of access to policy making in context. Recently I'd the pleasure of assisting Ms. Lily Yan, a third year law student who had interned at GoDaddy last Summer and developed an interest in the delegation policy for "sovereigns". She was directed to me by Professor Robert A. Williams, Jr., who assisted Bob Gough and I in ICANN's first Reconsideration Request (for an Indigenous Intellectual Property presence within the Intellectual Property Constituency). Her paper provides an accessible overview of the issues, unfortunately time and space available did not allow her to include materials that Jean Polly was kind enough to provide me, as well as other sources of primary documents and personal memories. Ms. Yan's received the first-place award for her paper, "Uncharted Domains and the New Land Rush: Indigenous Rights to Top-Level Domain", in the inaugural student research awards given by the Ross-Blakley Law Library. It may be read at, or downloaded from, the following URL: http://www.law.asu.edu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=67fmPnuMWEY%3d&tabid=803 I recommend this to anyone looking for reading on Indians and ICANN. For my own part I'll finish what I began during the Joint Application Support Working Group's lifetime and write a memo on Tribal Bonding Authority (US) and access to finance capital sufficient to meet the (sharply elevated over prior new gTLD rounds) financial criteria ICANN published in 2013/2013 for registry applicants, as I think this useful in its own right for informing the Community on the question of Indigenous Access, and directly addresses the organic capacity of Indigenous Governments to fund "participants" in ICANN beyond the current small set of such persons. Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene Oregon