Sometime back, Danny suggested that there should be a periodic review of ALSs that were never heard from, never voted or participated in anything. When it was first suggested, as Chair at the time I answered that it was too premature in NARALO's life to start pruning, that our goal was to be more inclusive rather then spend a lot of energy on de-certifying inactive ALSs (and in our case, individual members). Eventually, there will indeed be merit to such activity -- for the purposes of achieving quorum for votes, and to disallow anyone from publicising their involvement in NARALO even though they're not involved. Is it still too soon? Personally, I think so. In the case of Webwatch, IMO the tidiest thing to do is to ask CU for a letter of withdrawal. - Evan