Danny, A bit sarky view ;-) The fact that the constituencies are doing a more visible work may be derived from its higher status and their organizational integration and stability. At-Large is still in progress and evolution having just advisory voice in result. Therefore I would not compare who deserves what. However, I have to agree with Evan in that after the consolidation At-Large, by its organizational nature and the overall public outreach it is intended to cover, will need more money than other much smaller constituencies. The consolidation, however, also means the promotion of At-Large to a body with voting right. Dominik -----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Danny Younger Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 4:53 PM To: At-Large Staff; Evan Leibovitch Cc: Nick Ashton-Hart; NA Discuss Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Summary Minutes NARALO Teleconference 09 June Evan, You are at liberty to make the case that the at-large deserves more dollars than other constituent bodies. I would argue that those who do the work are to be rewarded, while those that accomplish almost nothing should receive almost nothing. ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists .icann.org Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------