Per our call last week: Here are my suggested re-scored priorities for all studies. However, I will start first with the re-groupings assigned letters. In each case, I established the priority score for each letter grouping, using original scoring from the list of all studies (in other words, the scores for the letter groupings make sense when compared to the entire chart of proposed studies, I did not score them separately.) A word on feasibility: Since I come from a research/investigative organization, my bias is towards the conclusion that just about anything can be studied. I did not assign a feasibility score to the letter groupings of studies. However, I did include a "yes" or "no" feasibility assessment for the individual study scores. 5=Highest 1=Lowest LETTER GROUPINGS: A: Studies 1, 14, 21 & GAC data set 2: 2 B: Studies 13, 17, GAC 1 and GAC 11: 5 C: GAC Studies 5 & 6: 4 D: Studies 18, 19, GAC 9 & GAC 10: 4 E: Studies 3 & 20: 3 The top grouping priority that emerges is: B: Studies 13, 17, GAC 1 and GAC 11: Outside these letter groups, the top-priority study grouping I would suggest for ALAC is: GAC 3, 16, GAC 12-15,24, GAC 7, 17, 6, GAC 1, 13 & GAC 11, 8. Note that GAC 3, 16, 24, GAC 7, GAC 1, and 8 do not appear in the letter groupings. Why were these studies, which I encourage ALAC to recommend as high priorities, not included? Study Table: Study Priority Score Feasible? 1 2 N 14 2 Y (SSAC has already studied) 15 3 Y 21 & GAC 2 2 N GAC 3 5 Premise needs development 16 5 Y 22 4 Y 23 2 Y GAC 12-15 5 Y 24 5 Y 2 1 Y 5 1 Y GAC 7 5 Y GAC 8 4 Y 17 5 Y 18, 19, GAC 9 & 10 4 Y 6 5 Y GAC 1 5 Y 13 & GAC 11 5 Y GAC 2 2 N 3 4 Y Metalitz 1 4 Y 20 3 Y 12 4 Y 8 5 Y 11 4 Technical analysis GAC 4 3 N GAC 5 4 Y GAC 6 4 Y ________________________________ From: At-Large Staff [mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 2:18 PM To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; Alan Greenberg; Brendler, Beau; Danny Younger; Gareth Shearman; seth.reis@lex-ip.com; sylvia.caras@gmail.com Subject: Doodle: WHOIS Briefing - follow up call / UTC timing Dear All, Apologies - timings on Doodle are in UTC for this call. Thank you Kind regards Gisella On 23/01/2009 11:11, "At-Large Staff" <staff@atlarge.icann.org> wrote: Dear All, Further to the WHOIS Briefing call by Liz Gasster yesterday, it was decided to have a follow up call to review the revised document Beau is in the process of developing. Please find attached the link to the doodle pole. It would be much appreciated if you could respond at your earliest convenience. http://doodle.com/fwixwace6fqu88cg Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White, Marie-Helene Bouchoms ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff@atlarge.icann.org *** Scanned ** This e-mail message is intended only for the designated recipient(s) named above. The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not review, retain, copy, redistribute or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments from your computer system.