Regarding your last paragraph. To be successful a URS complaint has to show more than the existence of a trademark that matches the domain. RT On Dec 13, 2011, at 3:22 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
One think that seems evident, as this knowledge becomes more widely disseminated, with the prospect of 100's of new gTLD's there will be a stampede to to the USPTO who are going to clean up at $275 per.
Hah. The real price of registering a trademark is more like $1000 and up, since it is quite rare for an initial application to be accepted as is.
Of course, asking a trademark lawyer if you should register a trademark is like asking an herbalist if you need some herbs. Well, duh.
The URS looks like another black hole to me. As we all know, trademarks are specific to an industry and geographic area, and registration is optional, while domain names are not. It is entirely possible, nay likely, that a domain name could exactly match a registered trademark yet have no intent to squat or confuse.
Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------