The original quote came from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_hijacking On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams < ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote:
Not really, but thanks for trying
Seth,
We appear to differ then on whether absent resolution by, or non-resolution to (as there are marks which are registered as domains for which no resolution is sought by the registrant), any public, a public interest exists.
If this is the case, would it be fair to characterize your view as being that every string generated under the old letters-digits-hyphen rule, or the two (newer and newest) valid IDN characters rule, having length less than 63 octets, is of equal public interest upon the act of registration?
If so, is this public-interest-upon-registration present in all registrations?
Can symbolics.com be distinguished from any of the registrations made while you read this? Can panix.com?
Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -