Sept. 15, 2009
3:37 p.m.
Garth Bruen at KnujOn wrote:
I've read the proposed studies and reviewed all the previous ones. They are designed to not find anything useful. Their methodology is flawed and the sample sizes too small to reveal anything meaningful. It's just for show. They've never moved on the GAO study or any other recommended fixes, I don't think the new studies will help.
That's fine, but we have to make that case clear in our position. We need to put forward -- with proof and compelling logic -- that a) the status quo is dangerous b) the proposed studies will only delay and not sufficiently advance the solution c) our proposal addresses both the needs and the concerns that exist. - Evan